These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15588824)

  • 1. SPI-EM: towards a tool for predicting CATH superfamilies in 3D-EM maps.
    Velázquez-Muriel JA; Sorzano CO; Scheres SH; Carazo JM
    J Mol Biol; 2005 Jan; 345(4):759-71. PubMed ID: 15588824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flexible fitting in 3D-EM guided by the structural variability of protein superfamilies.
    Velazquez-Muriel JA; Valle M; Santamaría-Pang A; Kakadiaris IA; Carazo JM
    Structure; 2006 Jul; 14(7):1115-26. PubMed ID: 16843893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flexible fitting in 3D-EM with incomplete data on superfamily variability.
    Velazquez-Muriel JA; Carazo JM
    J Struct Biol; 2007 May; 158(2):165-81. PubMed ID: 17257856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database.
    Reeves GA; Dallman TJ; Redfern OC; Akpor A; Orengo CA
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Jul; 360(3):725-41. PubMed ID: 16780872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein fold similarity estimated by a probabilistic approach based on C(alpha)-C(alpha) distance comparison.
    Carugo O; Pongor S
    J Mol Biol; 2002 Jan; 315(4):887-98. PubMed ID: 11812155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normal mode based flexible fitting of high-resolution structure into low-resolution experimental data from cryo-EM.
    Tama F; Miyashita O; Brooks CL
    J Struct Biol; 2004 Sep; 147(3):315-26. PubMed ID: 15450300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. GenDiS: Genomic Distribution of protein structural domain Superfamilies.
    Pugalenthi G; Bhaduri A; Sowdhamini R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jan; 33(Database issue):D252-5. PubMed ID: 15608190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ADP_EM: fast exhaustive multi-resolution docking for high-throughput coverage.
    Garzón JI; Kovacs J; Abagyan R; Chacón P
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 17150992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comprehensive and non-redundant database of protein domain movements.
    Qi G; Lee R; Hayward S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2832-8. PubMed ID: 15802286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible multi-scale fitting of atomic structures into low-resolution electron density maps with elastic network normal mode analysis.
    Tama F; Miyashita O; Brooks CL
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Apr; 337(4):985-99. PubMed ID: 15033365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling membrane proteins based on low-resolution electron microscopy maps: a template for the TM domains of the oxalate transporter OxlT.
    Beuming T; Weinstein H
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2005 Mar; 18(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 15820982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NORMA: a tool for flexible fitting of high-resolution protein structures into low-resolution electron-microscopy-derived density maps.
    Suhre K; Navaza J; Sanejouand YH
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2006 Sep; 62(Pt 9):1098-100. PubMed ID: 16929111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From electron microscopy maps to atomic structures using normal mode-based fitting.
    Hinsen K; Beaumont E; Fournier B; Lacapère JJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 654():237-58. PubMed ID: 20665270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biased coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulation approach for flexible fitting of X-ray structure into cryo electron microscopy maps.
    Grubisic I; Shokhirev MN; Orzechowski M; Miyashita O; Tama F
    J Struct Biol; 2010 Jan; 169(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 19800974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting protein structural class by functional domain composition.
    Chou KC; Cai YD
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2004 Sep; 321(4):1007-9. PubMed ID: 15358128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3did: interacting protein domains of known three-dimensional structure.
    Stein A; Russell RB; Aloy P
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jan; 33(Database issue):D413-7. PubMed ID: 15608228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partitioning protein structures into domains: why is it so difficult?
    Holland TA; Veretnik S; Shindyalov IN; Bourne PE
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Aug; 361(3):562-90. PubMed ID: 16863650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ProDom database of protein domain families: more emphasis on 3D.
    Bru C; Courcelle E; Carrère S; Beausse Y; Dalmar S; Kahn D
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2005 Jan; 33(Database issue):D212-5. PubMed ID: 15608179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What we have learned and will learn from cell ultrastructure in embedment-free section electron microscopy.
    Kondo H
    Microsc Res Tech; 2008 Jun; 71(6):418-42. PubMed ID: 18286471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integrating electron microscopy information into existing Distributed Annotation Systems.
    Macías JR; Jiménez-Lozano N; Carazo JM
    J Struct Biol; 2007 May; 158(2):205-13. PubMed ID: 17400476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.