BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15590238)

  • 1. Competing stimuli in the treatment of multiply controlled problem behavior during hygiene routines.
    Long ES; Hagopian LP; Deleon IG; Marhefka JM; Resau D
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 15590238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment and treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from attention and access to tangible items.
    Hagopian LP; Wilson DM; Wilder DA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 11421317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment-based intervention for severe behavior problems in a natural family context.
    Vaughn BJ; Clarke S; Dunlap G
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(4):713-6. PubMed ID: 9433797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of antecedent stimulus parameters for the treatment of escape-maintained aberrant behavior.
    Asmus JM; Wacker DP; Harding J; Berg WK; Derby KM; Kocis E
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):495-513. PubMed ID: 10641303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of differential negative reinforcement of other behavior and noncontingent escape on compliance.
    Kodak T; Miltenberger RG; Romaniuk C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 14596581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The detrimental effects of physical restraint as a consequence for inappropriate classroom behavior.
    Magee SK; Ellis J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):501-4. PubMed ID: 11800190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method for identifying satiation versus extinction effects under noncontingent reinforcement schedules.
    Kahng SW; Iwata BA; Thompson RH; Hanley GP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(4):419-32. PubMed ID: 11214020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.
    Hagopian LP; Rush KS; Lewin AB; Long ES
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 11800186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hypothesis-based interventions for tantrum behaviors of persons with developmental disabilities in school settings.
    Repp AC; Karsh KG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 8188561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manipulating the behavior-altering effect of the motivating operation: examination of the influence on challenging behavior during leisure activities.
    O'Reilly MF; Sigafoos J; Lancioni G; Rispoli M; Lang R; Chan J; Machalicek W; Langthorne P
    Res Dev Disabil; 2008; 29(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 17629672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of competing reinforcement schedules on the acquisition of functional communication.
    Kelley ME; Lerman DC; Van Camp CM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11936546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a pre-treatment assessment to select mand topographies for functional communication training.
    Ringdahl JE; Falcomata TS; Christensen TJ; Bass-Ringdahl SM; Lentz A; Dutt A; Schuh-Claus J
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(2):330-41. PubMed ID: 18672344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional communication training in the treatment of problem behavior maintained by access to rituals.
    Rispoli M; Camargo S; Machalicek W; Lang R; Sigafoos J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):580-93. PubMed ID: 24817482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.
    Roane HS; Vollmer TR; Ringdahl JE; Marcus BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 9891397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of presession manipulations on automatically maintained challenging behavior and task responding.
    Chung YC; Cannella-Malone HI
    Behav Modif; 2010 Nov; 34(6):479-502. PubMed ID: 20660927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors.
    Horner RH; Day HM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(4):719-32. PubMed ID: 1839157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Carr JE; Severtson JM; Lepper TL
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 18467073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individualized sampling parameters for behavioral observations: enhancing the predictive validity of competing stimulus assessments.
    DeLeon IG; Toole LM; Gutshall KA; Bowman LG
    Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(5):440-55. PubMed ID: 16168882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of multiply controlled problem behavior.
    Lalli JS; Casey SD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 8810063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Further analysis of problem behavior in response class hierarchies.
    Richman DM; Wacker DP; Asmus JM; Casey SD; Andelman M
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(3):269-83. PubMed ID: 10513024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.