300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15590618)
21. [Neuroscience and criminal law: new perspectives for old problems].
Mercurio EN
Vertex; 2009; 20(83):62-70. PubMed ID: 19434302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Law, evolution and the brain: applications and open questions.
Jones OD
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2004 Nov; 359(1451):1697-707. PubMed ID: 15590611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
Manson R; Marolt J
Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Debunking (the) Retribution (Gap).
Kraaijeveld SR
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Jun; 26(3):1315-1328. PubMed ID: 31620955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An Evidence-Based Objection to Retributive Justice.
Mammarella BTM
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2016; 16(2):289-326. PubMed ID: 29756753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The historical debate on brain and legal responsibility--revisited.
Kroeber HL
Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 17393406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet.
Bigenwald A; Chambon V
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1406. PubMed ID: 31316418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The concept of free will and forensic psychiatry.
Juth N; Lorentzon F
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19897248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Loss of free will in the Iranian criminal justice system: Interdisciplinary analysis of law and neuroscience.
Petoft A; Abbasi M; Zali A
Soc Neurosci; 2023 Dec; 18(5):292-296. PubMed ID: 37534859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Mechanical Choices: A Compatibilist Libertarian Response.
List C
Crim Law Philos; 2023 Mar; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 37361131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The emergence of consequential thought: evidence from neuroscience.
Baird AA; Fugelsang JA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2004 Nov; 359(1451):1797-804. PubMed ID: 15590620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Law and the sources of morality.
Hinde RA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2004 Nov; 359(1451):1685-95. PubMed ID: 15590610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Neuroscience and legal determination of criminal responsibility.
Eastman N; Campbell C
Nat Rev Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 7(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 16552416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Rethinking the voluntary act requirement: Implications from neuroscience and behavioral science research.
Gordon NS; Fondacaro MR
Behav Sci Law; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30003577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Seeing responsibility: can neuroimaging teach us anything about moral and legal responsibility?
Wasserman D; Johnston J
Hastings Cent Rep; 2014; Spec No():S37-49. PubMed ID: 24634084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Clinical neuropsychology in perspective: future challenges based on current developments].
Verdejo-García A; Tirapu-Ustárroz J
Rev Neurol; 2012 Feb; 54(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 22278895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [The normative concept of guilt in criminal law between freedom of will and neurobiological determinism].
Czerner F
Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(5-6):129-57. PubMed ID: 17217181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can brain scans prove criminals unaccountable?
Roache R
AJOB Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 5(2):35-37. PubMed ID: 25009758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Protecting fetuses from prenatal hazards: whose crimes? what punishment?
Nolan K
Crim Justice Ethics; 1990; 9(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 11650907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
Cobun LS
Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
