132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15592029)
1. Accuracy of prostate weight estimation by digital rectal examination versus transrectal ultrasonography.
Loeb S; Han M; Roehl KA; Antenor JA; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):63-5. PubMed ID: 15592029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation between prostate size estimated by digital rectal examination and measured by transrectal ultrasound.
Roehrborn CG; Girman CJ; Rhodes T; Hanson KA; Collins GN; Sech SM; Jacobsen SJ; Garraway WM; Lieber MM
Urology; 1997 Apr; 49(4):548-57. PubMed ID: 9111624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interexaminer reliability and validity of a three-dimensional model to assess prostate volume by digital rectal examination.
Roehrborn CG; Sech S; Montoya J; Rhodes T; Girman CJ
Urology; 2001 Jun; 57(6):1087-92. PubMed ID: 11377314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
Lee JS; Chung BH
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimation of prostate weight: comparison of urologists and radiologists.
Nunez-Nateras R; Andrews JR; Martin GL; Andrews PE; Humphreys MR; Ferrigni RG; Eversman WG; Castle EP
Can J Urol; 2010 Feb; 17(1):4985-8. PubMed ID: 20156377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer.
Sanchez-Chapado M; Angulo JC; Ibarburen C; Aguado F; Ruiz A; Viaño J; García-Segura JM; Gonzalez-Esteban J; Rodriquez-Vallejo JM
Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 9286643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Comparison of Imaging and Clinical Methods to Estimate Prostate Volume: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.
Massanova M; Robertson S; Barone B; Dutto L; Caputo VF; Bhatt JR; Ahmad I; Bada M; Obeidallah A; Crocetto F
Urol Int; 2021; 105(9-10):804-810. PubMed ID: 34247169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The accuracy of transrectal ultrasound prostate volume estimation: clinical correlations.
Matthews GJ; Motta J; Fracehia JA
J Clin Ultrasound; 1996; 24(9):501-5. PubMed ID: 8906481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography to evaluate pathologic prostate weight: correlation with various prostate size groups.
Bienz M; Hueber PA; Al-Hathal N; McCormack M; Bhojani N; Trinh QD; Zorn KC
Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):169-74. PubMed ID: 24976231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative contribution of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in interpreting serum prostate-specific antigen values for screening prostate cancer in Arab men.
Sheikh M; Sinan T; Kehinde EO; Hussein AY; Anim JT; Al-Hunayan AA
Ann Saudi Med; 2007; 27(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 17356323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The clinical utility of transrectal ultrasound and digital rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Shapiro A; Lebensart PD; Pode D; Bloom RA
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jul; 67(799):668-71. PubMed ID: 8062008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer - by digital rectal examination or transrectal ultrasonography?
Hsu CY; Joniau S; Oyen R; Roskams T; Van Poppel H
BJU Int; 2006 Nov; 98(5):982-5. PubMed ID: 16945120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is preoperative transrectal ultrasonography of value in localised prostatic carcinoma? A blind comparative study between preoperative transrectal ultrasonography and the histopathological radical prostatectomy specimen.
Vijverberg PL; Giessen MC; Kurth KH; Dabhoiwala NF; de Reijke TM; van den Tweel JG
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1992 Oct; 18(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 1426295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of transrectal ultrasound in preoperative staging of prostate cancer.
Colombo T; Schips L; Augustin H; Gruber H; Hebel P; Petritsch PH; Hubmer G
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 1999 Mar; 51(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10222753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Clarius, Handheld Wireless Point-of-Care Ultrasound, in Evaluating Prostate Morphology and Volume Compared to Radical Prostatectomy Specimen Weight: Is There a Difference between Transabdominal
Moussaoui G; Zakaria AS; Negrean C; Nguyen DD; Couture F; Tholomier C; Sadri I; Arezki A; Schwartz RN; Elterman DS; Misrai V; Bhojani N; Herrmann TRW; Zorn KC
J Endourol; 2021 Sep; 35(9):1300-1306. PubMed ID: 33677990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility of digital rectal examination, serum prostate specific antigen, and transrectal ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a developing country perspective.
Kash DP; Lal M; Hashmi AH; Mubarak M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(7):3087-91. PubMed ID: 24815452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate cancer volume estimations based on transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in order to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.
Konyalioglu E; Tarhan H; Cakmak O; Pala EE; Zorlu F
Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 26200537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
