These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15592213)

  • 1. Transverse skeletal base adaptations with Bionator therapy: a pilot implant study.
    Marotta Araujo A; Buschang PH; Melo AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):666-71. PubMed ID: 15592213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transverse maxillary and mandibular growth during and after bionator therapy: study with metallic implants.
    Monini Ada C; Júnior LG; Maia LG; Pinto Ados S
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):72-9. PubMed ID: 24094014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.
    Almeida MR; Henriques JF; Almeida RR; Almeida-Pedrin RR; Ursi W
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 14994884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptive condylar growth and mandibular remodelling changes with bionator therapy--an implant study.
    Araujo AM; Buschang PH; Melo AC
    Eur J Orthod; 2004 Oct; 26(5):515-22. PubMed ID: 15536840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions.
    Lux CJ; Conradt C; Burden D; Komposch G
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):674-85. PubMed ID: 14719732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clarifying the mechanism of effect of the Bionator for treatment of maxillary protrusion: A percentile growth study.
    Oda H; Sandou M; Lin CM; Kamata M; Kawata T
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):213-219. PubMed ID: 27759410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy.
    Faltin KJ; Faltin RM; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Ghiozzi B; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 12828429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment effects of headgear biteplane and bionator appliances.
    Almeida-Pedrin RR; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Ferreira FP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 17693369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.
    Illing HM; Morris DO; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 9825553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maxillary and mandibular width changes studied using metallic implants.
    Gandini LG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10629523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear.
    Keeling SD; Wheeler TT; King GJ; Garvan CW; Cohen DA; Cabassa S; McGorray SP; Taylor MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 9457018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA; Tollaro I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 May; 111(5):502-9. PubMed ID: 9155809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandibular response after rapid maxillary expansion in class II growing patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Lione R; Brunelli V; Franchi L; Pavoni C; Quiroga Souki B; Cozza P
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Nov; 18(1):36. PubMed ID: 29105023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Bishara SE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jun; 113(6):661-73. PubMed ID: 9637570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cephalometric evaluation of dento-skeletal changes during treatment with the Bionator type 1.
    Carels C; Reychler A; van der Linden FP
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Nov; 24(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 9426166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.
    Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Feb; 85(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 6594053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skeletal and functional effects of treatment for unilateral posterior crossbite.
    Brin I; Ben-Bassat Y; Blustein Y; Ehrlich J; Hochman N; Marmary Y; Yaffe A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Feb; 109(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 8638566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
    Cura N; Saraç M
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentofacial growth in orthodontically treated and untreated children with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). A comparison with Angle Class II division 1 subjects.
    Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S; Thilander B
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):357-73. PubMed ID: 8529749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.