705 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15592552)
1. Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
Foley J; Evans D; Blackwell A
Br Dent J; 2004 Dec; 197(11):697-701; discussion 689. PubMed ID: 15592552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results.
Qvist V; Manscher E; Teglers PT
J Dent; 2004 May; 32(4):285-94. PubMed ID: 15053911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. One-year survival of occlusal ART restorations in primary molars placed with and without cavity conditioner.
Yassen G
J Dent Child (Chic); 2009; 76(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 19619427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo cariostatic effect of black copper cement on carious dentine.
Foley J; Blackwell A
Caries Res; 2003; 37(4):254-60. PubMed ID: 12771500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
Banomyong D; Messer H
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial of beveled cavity preparations in primary molars: an 18-Month follow up.
Oliveira CA; Dias PF; Dos Santos MP; Maia LC
J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):754-8. PubMed ID: 18579283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
Markovic D; Peric T
Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial.
Phonghanyudh A; Phantumvanit P; Songpaisan Y; Petersen PE
Community Dent Health; 2012 Jun; 29(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 22779380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ketac Molar Versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results.
Marks LA; van Amerongen WE; Borgmeijer PJ; Groen HJ; Martens LC
ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(1):37-41, 8-9. PubMed ID: 10736656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical failure of class-II restorations of a highly viscous glass-ionomer material over a 6-year period: a retrospective study.
Scholtanus JD; Huysmans MC
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16973253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microbiological analysis after complete or partial removal of carious dentin in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial.
Lula EC; Monteiro-Neto V; Alves CM; Ribeiro CC
Caries Res; 2009; 43(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 19648746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical effects of glass ionomer restorations on residual carious dentin in primary molars.
Smales RJ; Ngo HC; Yip KH; Yu C
Am J Dent; 2005 Jun; 18(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 16158811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of conventional versus colored compomers for class II restorations in primary molars: a 12-month clinical study.
Ertugrul F; Cogulu D; Ozdemir Y; Ersin N
Med Princ Pract; 2010; 19(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 20134179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Restoring proximal lesions in the primary dentition: is glass ionomer cement the material of choice?
Scott JM; Mahoney EK
N Z Dent J; 2003 Sep; 99(3):65-71. PubMed ID: 15328832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Restoration of primary teeth: a study of copper phosphate cement.
Foley J; Evans DJ; Blackwell A
Health Bull (Edinb); 2001 Jan; 59(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 12811910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars.
Rutar J; McAllan L; Tyas MJ
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):486-8. PubMed ID: 11132508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Caries control and other variables associated with success of primary molar vital pulp therapy.
Vij R; Coll JA; Shelton P; Farooq NS
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 15185801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival of self-etch adhesive Class II composite restorations using ART and conventional cavity preparations in primary molars.
Eden E; Topaloglu-Ak A; Frencken JE; van't Hof M
Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 17212078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
