These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15592591)
1. Points of view: lectures: can't learn with them, can't learn without them. Lodish HF; Rodriguez RK; Klionsky DJ Cell Biol Educ; 2004; 3(4):202-11. PubMed ID: 15592591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Approaches to cell biology teaching: learning content in context--problem-based learning. Allen D; Tanner K Cell Biol Educ; 2003; 2(2):73-81. PubMed ID: 12888838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Students' studying and approaches to learning in introductory biology. Tomanek D; Montplaisir L Cell Biol Educ; 2004; 3(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 15592598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approaches to biology teaching and learning: learning styles and the problem of instructional selection--engaging all students in science courses. Tanner K; Allen D Cell Biol Educ; 2004; 3(4):197-201. PubMed ID: 15592590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Shrink wrapping" lectures: teaching cell and molecular biology within the context of human pathologies. Guilford WH Cell Biol Educ; 2005; 4(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 15917872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Approaches to cell biology teaching: cooperative learning in the science classroom--beyond students working in groups. Tanner K; Chatman LS; Allen D Cell Biol Educ; 2003; 2(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12822033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Using online lectures to make time for active learning. Prunuske AJ; Batzli J; Howell E; Miller S Genetics; 2012 Sep; 192(1):67-72; quiz 1Sl-3SL. PubMed ID: 22714412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing biology majors from large lecture classes with TA-facilitated laboratories to those from small lecture classes with faculty-facilitated laboratories. Goodman BE; Koster KL; Redinius PL Adv Physiol Educ; 2005 Jun; 29(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 15905156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. University learning: Improve undergraduate science education. Bradforth SE; Miller ER; Dichtel WR; Leibovich AK; Feig AL; Martin JD; Bjorkman KS; Schultz ZD; Smith TL Nature; 2015 Jul; 523(7560):282-4. PubMed ID: 26178951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Approaches to cell biology teaching: mapping the journey-concept maps as signposts of developing knowledge structures. Allen D; Tanner K Cell Biol Educ; 2003; 2(3):133-6. PubMed ID: 14506500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Haak DC; HilleRisLambers J; Pitre E; Freeman S Science; 2011 Jun; 332(6034):1213-6. PubMed ID: 21636776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Teaching cell biology in the large-enrollment classroom: methods to promote analytical thinking and assessment of their effectiveness. Kitchen E; Bell JD; Reeve S; Sudweeks RR; Bradshaw WS Cell Biol Educ; 2003; 2(3):180-94. PubMed ID: 14506506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing students' ability to trace matter in dynamic systems in cell biology. Wilson CD; Anderson CW; Heidemann M; Merrill JE; Merritt BW; Richmond G; Sibley DF; Parker JM CBE Life Sci Educ; 2006; 5(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 17146039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring the context of drug use: a problem-based learning course in pharmacoepidemiology for undergraduate science students. Rangachari PK Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2004 Feb; 369(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 14722623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. Andrews TM; Leonard MJ; Colgrove CA; Kalinowski ST CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(4):394-405. PubMed ID: 22135373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relational databases: a transparent framework for encouraging biology students to think informatically. Rice M; Gladstone W; Weir M Cell Biol Educ; 2004; 3(4):241-52. PubMed ID: 15592597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Students' views of cooperative learning and group testing. Hicks J Radiol Technol; 2007; 78(4):275-83. PubMed ID: 17389420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delivery of a urology online course using Moodle versus didactic lectures methods. Reis LO; Ikari O; Taha-Neto KA; Gugliotta A; Denardi F Int J Med Inform; 2015 Feb; 84(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 25466380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. STEM teaching: use more innovations. Holbrook L Nature; 2015 Aug; 524(7564):161. PubMed ID: 26268181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Video Triggering During Conventional Lectures on Final Grades of Dental Students in an Oral Biology Course: A Two-Year Retrospective Study. Farooq I; Al-Jandan BA J Dent Educ; 2015 Dec; 79(12):1467-70. PubMed ID: 26632302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]