446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15592698)
1. Influence of calculation algorithm on dose distribution in irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) collapsed cone versus pencil beam.
Koelbl O; Krieger T; Haedinger U; Sauer O; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Dec; 180(12):783-8. PubMed ID: 15592698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of calculation model on dose distribution in stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary targets.
Haedinger U; Krieger T; Flentje M; Wulf J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jan; 61(1):239-49. PubMed ID: 15629617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with multileaf collimators (MLCs) optimization of the undulating dose distribution at the MLC edge.
Koelbl O; Schwab F; Bratengeier K; Vordermark D; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Feb; 181(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 15702299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SBRT of lung tumours: Monte Carlo simulation with PENELOPE of dose distributions including respiratory motion and comparison with different treatment planning systems.
Panettieri V; Wennberg B; Gagliardi G; Duch MA; Ginjaume M; Lax I
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4265-81. PubMed ID: 17664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of lateral electronic disequilibrium on the radiation treatment planning for lung cancer irradiation.
Fu W; Dai J; Hu Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):123-6. PubMed ID: 14757959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The implementation of an advanced treatment planning algorithm in the treatment of lung cancer with conventional radiotherapy.
Pearson M; Atherton P; McMenemin R; McDonald F; Mazdai G; Mulvenna P; Lambert G
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Apr; 21(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 19162457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tissue heterogeneity in IMRT dose calculation for lung cancer.
Pasciuti K; Iaccarino G; Strigari L; Malatesta T; Benassi M; Di Nallo AM; Mirri A; Pinzi V; Landoni V
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 20970989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of forward planning with automated inverse planning for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer without IMRT.
Mendes R; Lavrenkov K; Bedford JL; Henrys A; Ashley S; Brada M
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 16564591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric analysis of the patterns of local failure observed in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent conformal (3D-CRT) chemoradiation.
Moreno-Jiménez M; Aristu J; López-Picazo JM; Ramos LI; Gúrpide A; Gómez-Iturriaga A; Valero J; Martínez-Monge R
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Sep; 88(3):342-50. PubMed ID: 18558448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; Badkul R; Jiang H; McClinton C; Lominska C; Kumar P; Wang F
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):277-293. PubMed ID: 27167284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of 201 non-small cell lung cancer patients given stereotactic ablative radiation therapy shows local control dependence on dose calculation algorithm.
Latifi K; Oliver J; Baker R; Dilling TJ; Stevens CW; Kim J; Yue B; Demarco M; Zhang GG; Moros EG; Feygelman V
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Apr; 88(5):1108-13. PubMed ID: 24529716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy.
Fiorino C; Dell'Oca I; Pierelli A; Broggi S; De Martin E; Di Muzio N; Longobardi B; Fazio F; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 16546279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Presentation of a 3D conformal radiotherapy technique for head-and-neck tumors resulting in substantial protection of the parotid glands].
Kuhnt T; Janich M; Götz U; Gerlach R; Chiricuta IC; Hänsgen G
Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Jun; 182(6):325-30. PubMed ID: 16703287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
Krieger T; Sauer OA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.
Soisson ET; Tomé WA; Richards GM; Mehta MP
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16490269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proton beam radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal stereotactic body radiotherapy in primary peripheral, early-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a comparative dosimetric analysis.
Macdonald OK; Kruse JJ; Miller JM; Garces YI; Brown PD; Miller RC; Foote RL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Nov; 75(3):950-8. PubMed ID: 19801106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of interfractional set-up errors and intrafractional organ motions during IMRT for head and neck tumors to define an appropriate planning target volume (PTV)- and planning organs at risk volume (PRV)-margins.
Suzuki M; Nishimura Y; Nakamatsu K; Okumura M; Hashiba H; Koike R; Kanamori S; Shibata T
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 16564594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A phase I/II trial to evaluate three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy confined to the region of the lumpectomy cavity for Stage I/II breast carcinoma: initial report of feasibility and reproducibility of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Study 0319.
Vicini F; Winter K; Straube W; Wong J; Pass H; Rabinovitch R; Chafe S; Arthur D; Petersen I; McCormick B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Dec; 63(5):1531-7. PubMed ID: 16198508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm].
Treutwein M; Bogner L
Strahlenther Onkol; 2007 Aug; 183(8):454-8. PubMed ID: 17680226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
