These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1559286)

  • 1. Comparative efficacy of contact lens disinfection solutions.
    Lowe R; Vallas V; Brennan NA
    CLAO J; 1992 Jan; 18(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 1559286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of multi-purpose lens care solutions using the FDA's revised guidance document for industry: stand-alone primary criteria.
    Lever AM; Miller MJ
    CLAO J; 1999 Jan; 25(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10073638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disinfection efficacy of contact lens care solutions against ocular pathogens.
    Miller MJ; Callahan DE; McGrath D; Manchester R; Norton SE
    CLAO J; 2001 Jan; 27(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11215601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disinfecting activities of non-peroxide soft contact lens cold disinfection solutions.
    Shih KL; Raad MK; Hu JC; Gresh WJ; Jiries SI; Caldwell LJ; Bergamini MV
    CLAO J; 1991 Jul; 17(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 1893538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new method for evaluation of compatibility of contact lenses and lens cases with contact lens disinfecting solutions.
    Mowrey-McKee M; Borazjani R; Collins G; Cook J; Norton S
    Eye Contact Lens; 2012 Jan; 38(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 22178791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antimicrobial comparison of a new multi-purpose disinfecting solution to a 3% hydrogen peroxide system.
    Rosenthal RA; Buck S; McAnally C; Abshire R; Schlech B
    CLAO J; 1999 Oct; 25(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 10555736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of the microbiologic effectiveness of chemical disinfectants and peroxide-neutralizer systems.
    Rosenthal RA; Stein JM; McAnally CL; Schlech BA
    CLAO J; 1995 Apr; 21(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 7796529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions in the Presence of Contact Lenses and Lens Cases.
    Gabriel MM; McAnally C; Bartell J
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Mar; 44(2):125-131. PubMed ID: 27598555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative efficacies of soft contact lens disinfection systems against a fungal contaminant.
    Richardson LE; Begley CG; Keck GK
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):210-4. PubMed ID: 8454840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sterility and the disinfection potential of Indian contact lens solutions.
    Gopinathan U; Sharma S; Boghani S; Rao GN
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 1994 Jun; 42(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 7927633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Status of the effectiveness of contact lens solutions against keratitis-causing pathogens.
    Siddiqui R; Lakhundi S; Khan NA
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Feb; 38(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25280981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antimicrobial efficacy of two commercial RGP contact lens care systems.
    Modi P; Gresh W; Shih K
    CLAO J; 1995 Jan; 21(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 7712601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of contact lens disinfecting solutions against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
    Manuj K; Gunderson C; Troupe J; Huber ME
    Eye Contact Lens; 2006 Jul; 32(4):216-8. PubMed ID: 16845270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acidified nitrite enhances hydrogen peroxide disinfection of Acanthamoeba, bacteria and fungi.
    Heaselgrave W; Andrew PW; Kilvington S
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Jun; 65(6):1207-14. PubMed ID: 20335189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of regimen methods for the removal and inactivation of bacteria, fungi and Acanthamoeba from two types of silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Kilvington S; Lonnen J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Apr; 32(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 19201251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. D-value determinations are an inappropriate measure of disinfecting activity of common contact lens disinfecting solutions.
    Sutton SV; Franco RJ; Porter DA; Mowrey-McKee MF; Busschaert SC; Hamberger JF; Proud DW
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1991 Jul; 57(7):2021-6. PubMed ID: 1892391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions.
    Hildebrandt C; Wagner D; Kohlmann T; Kramer A
    BMC Infect Dis; 2012 Oct; 12():241. PubMed ID: 23033880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aspects of the antimicrobial mechanisms of action of a polyquaternium and an amidoamine.
    Codling CE; Maillard JY; Russell AD
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2003 May; 51(5):1153-8. PubMed ID: 12697638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Susceptibility of various corneal fungal isolates and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to contact lens disinfecting solutions.
    Pinna A; Usai D; Zanetti S; Thomas PA; Kaliamurthy J
    J Infect Dev Ctries; 2013 Mar; 7(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 23493005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduction of disinfection efficacy of contact lens care products on the global market in the presence of contact lenses and cases.
    Walters R; Campolo A; Miller E; Gabriel MM; Crary M; McAnally C; Shannon P
    BMJ Open Ophthalmol; 2022 Jun; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 36161836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.