These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15592986)

  • 1. Robotic technology and stroke rehabilitation: translating research into practice.
    Fasoli SE; Krebs HI; Hogan N
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2004; 11(4):11-9. PubMed ID: 15592986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
    Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke.
    Chang JJ; Tung WL; Wu WL; Huang MH; Su FC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 17908578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Post-stroke robotic training of the upper limb in the early rehabilitation phase.
    Masiero S; Rosati G; Valarini S; Rossi A
    Funct Neurol; 2009; 24(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 20412726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Translating research into clinical practice: integrating robotics into neurorehabilitation for stroke survivors.
    Backus D; Winchester P; Tefertiller C
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2010; 17(5):362-70. PubMed ID: 21131261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation.
    Volpe BT; Krebs HI; Hogan N
    Adv Neurol; 2003; 92():429-33. PubMed ID: 12760210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: a review and clinical perspective.
    Bishop L; Stein J
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23949043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation.
    Masiero S; Poli P; Rosati G; Zanotto D; Iosa M; Paolucci S; Morone G
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2014 Mar; 11(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 24479445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [ARMOR: an electromechanical robot for upper limb training following stroke. A prospective randomised controlled pilot study].
    Mayr A; Kofler M; Saltuari L
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2008 Feb; 40(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 18322901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Upper limb robotics applied to neurorehabilitation: An overview of clinical practice.
    Duret C; Mazzoleni S
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 41(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 28505985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design, implementation and clinical tests of a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation.
    Rosati G; Gallina P; Masiero S
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Dec; 15(4):560-9. PubMed ID: 18198714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Arm rehabilitation : Current concepts and therapeutic options].
    Platz T; Schmuck L
    Nervenarzt; 2016 Oct; 87(10):1057-1061. PubMed ID: 27531207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transfer of scientific concepts to clinical practice: recent robot-assisted training studies.
    Waldner A; Tomelleri C; Hesse S
    Funct Neurol; 2009; 24(4):173-7. PubMed ID: 20412721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing productivity and quality of care: robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation.
    Krebs HI; Volpe BT; Aisen ML; Hogan N
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2000; 37(6):639-52. PubMed ID: 11321000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The place of robotics in post-stroke rehabilitation.
    Rosati G
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2010 Nov; 7(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 21050086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of visual error augmentation when integrated with assist-as-needed training method in robot-assisted rehabilitation.
    Wang F; Barkana DE; Sarkar N
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Oct; 18(5):571-9. PubMed ID: 20639181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fuzzy control of a hand rehabilitation robot to optimize the exercise speed in passive working mode.
    Baniasad MA; Akbar M; Alasty A; Farahmand F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():39-43. PubMed ID: 21335755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(1):50-63. PubMed ID: 17626223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke.
    Fasoli SE; Krebs HI; Stein J; Frontera WR; Hogan N
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Apr; 84(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 12690583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.