These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15593270)

  • 41. Reducing Sensor Noise in MEG and EEG Recordings Using Oversampled Temporal Projection.
    Larson E; Taulu S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 May; 65(5):1002-1013. PubMed ID: 28783620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Channel selection and classification of electroencephalogram signals: an artificial neural network and genetic algorithm-based approach.
    Yang J; Singh H; Hines EL; Schlaghecken F; Iliescu DD; Leeson MS; Stocks NG
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jun; 55(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 22503644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An MEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI).
    Mellinger J; Schalk G; Braun C; Preissl H; Rosenstiel W; Birbaumer N; Kübler A
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(3):581-93. PubMed ID: 17475511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Optical sensor position indicator for neonatal MEG.
    Urban E; Wakai RT
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jan; 59(1):255-62. PubMed ID: 22010142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Noise-free magnetoencephalography recordings of brain function.
    Volegov P; Matlachov A; Mosher J; Espy MA; Kraus RH
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 May; 49(10):2117-28. PubMed ID: 15214546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Signal-to-noise ratio of the MEG signal after preprocessing.
    Gonzalez-Moreno A; Aurtenetxe S; Lopez-Garcia ME; del Pozo F; Maestu F; Nevado A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():56-61. PubMed ID: 24200506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Head movements of children in MEG: quantification, effects on source estimation, and compensation.
    Wehner DT; Hämäläinen MS; Mody M; Ahlfors SP
    Neuroimage; 2008 Apr; 40(2):541-550. PubMed ID: 18252273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Real-Time MEG Source Localization Using Regional Clustering.
    Dinh C; Strohmeier D; Luessi M; Güllmar D; Baumgarten D; Haueisen J; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Nov; 28(6):771-84. PubMed ID: 25782980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dipole source localization of MEG by BP neural networks.
    Kinouchi Y; Ohara G; Nagashino H; Soga T; Shichijo F; Matsumoto K
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 8728425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A signal-processing pipeline for magnetoencephalography resting-state networks.
    Mantini D; Della Penna S; Marzetti L; de Pasquale F; Pizzella V; Corbetta M; Romani GL
    Brain Connect; 2011; 1(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 22432954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Transformation of whole-head MEG recordings between different sensor positions.
    Knösche TR
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002 Mar; 47(3):59-62. PubMed ID: 11977444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Measuring MEG closer to the brain: Performance of on-scalp sensor arrays.
    Iivanainen J; Stenroos M; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():542-553. PubMed ID: 28007515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Time-delayed decorrelation for the identification of cardiac artifact components in MEG data.
    Sander TH; Lueschow A; Curio G; Trahms L
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():573-6. PubMed ID: 12465241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Functional imaging of the brain. Magnetoencephalography (MEG)].
    Huk WJ; Vieth J
    Radiologe; 1993 Nov; 33(11):633-8. PubMed ID: 8278590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Optimization of an independent component analysis approach for artifact identification and removal in magnetoencephalographic signals.
    Barbati G; Porcaro C; Zappasodi F; Rossini PM; Tecchio F
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 May; 115(5):1220-32. PubMed ID: 15066548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The use of an MEG device as 3D digitizer and motion monitoring system.
    de Munck JC; Verbunt JP; Van't Ent D; Van Dijk BW
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Aug; 46(8):2041-52. PubMed ID: 11512609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Automatic and robust noise suppression in EEG and MEG: The SOUND algorithm.
    Mutanen TP; Metsomaa J; Liljander S; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 166():135-151. PubMed ID: 29061529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Estimating scalp MEG from whole-head MEG measurements.
    Wang Y; Oertel U
    Brain Topogr; 2000; 12(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 10791684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.