These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15595893)

  • 1. The perceptual and cognitive distractor-previewing effect.
    Ariga A; Kawahara J
    J Vis; 2004 Oct; 4(10):891-903. PubMed ID: 15595893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking.
    Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conflict-induced perceptual filtering.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):675-86. PubMed ID: 22004199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Open and closed cortico-subcortical loops: A neuro-computational account of access to consciousness in the distractor-induced blindness paradigm.
    Ebner C; Schroll H; Winther G; Niedeggen M; Hamker FH
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():295-307. PubMed ID: 25802010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intertrial inhibition of focused attention in pop-out search.
    Lleras A; Kawahara J; Wan XI; Ariga A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):114-31. PubMed ID: 18306966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of distractor load and temporal target-distractor separation on numerical comparison performance: a stimulus-competition approach.
    Paas F; Adam JJ
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):889-906. PubMed ID: 12090526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Age-related differences in the distractor previewing effect with schematic faces of emotions.
    Wan X; Tian L; Lleras A
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2014; 21(4):386-410. PubMed ID: 23957762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Dux PE; Coltheart V; Harris IM
    Cognition; 2006 Apr; 99(3):355-82. PubMed ID: 15993401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The depth of distractor processing in search with clutter.
    Bravo MJ; Farid H
    Perception; 2007; 36(6):821-9. PubMed ID: 17718361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The "red-alert" effect in visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Dell'acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Jul; 50(7):671-9. PubMed ID: 23577877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dimension-specific signal modulation in visual search: evidence from inter-stimulus surround suppression.
    Chan LK; Hayward WG
    J Vis; 2012 Apr; 12(4):10. PubMed ID: 22514331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?
    Scolari M; Kohnen A; Barton B; Awh E
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):7.1-23. PubMed ID: 18217822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology.
    Hilimire MR; Hickey C; Corballis PM
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Apr; 49(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 22176697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The meaning of the mask matters: evidence of conceptual interference in the attentional blink.
    Dux PE; Coltheart V
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):775-9. PubMed ID: 16181439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related effects in inter-trial inhibition of attention.
    Wan X; Voss M; Lleras A
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2011 Sep; 18(5):562-76. PubMed ID: 21756189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is "marked" in visual marking? Evidence for effects of configuration in preview search.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW; Smith KJ; Hulleman J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Aug; 65(6):982-96. PubMed ID: 14528904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.