BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15596177)

  • 1. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
    Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
    Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
    Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
    Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.
    Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS
    Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of proximal ureteric calculi: a cost-effectiveness study.
    Izamin I; Aniza I; Rizal AM; Aljunid SM
    Med J Malaysia; 2009 Mar; 64(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 19852314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
    Salem HK
    Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.
    Lindqvist K; Holmberg G; Peeker R; Grenabo L
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2006; 40(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 16608808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
    Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
    Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Distal ureteral lithiasis. ESWL versus ambulatory URS].
    Miján Ortiz JL; Gutiérrez Tejero F; López Carmona F; Nogueras Ocaña M; Arrabal Martín M; Zuluaga Gómez A
    Arch Esp Urol; 2001 Nov; 54(9):983-7. PubMed ID: 11789375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.
    Zhang J; Shi Q; Wang GZ; Wang F; Jiang N
    Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
    Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
    Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
    El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
    BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrograde endoscopic management of ureteral stones more than 2 cm in size.
    Mugiya S; Ozono S; Nagata M; Takayama T; Nagae H
    Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1164-8; discussion 1168. PubMed ID: 16765171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Extracorporeal lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the treatment of calculi of the lower ureter].
    Netto Júnior NR; Claro JF
    Prog Urol; 1993 Feb; 3(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 8485594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment of ureteric lithiasis with retrograde ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy vs extracorporeal lithotripsy.
    Arrabal-Polo MA; Arrabal-Martín M; Miján-Ortiz JL; Valle-Díaz F; López-León V; Merino-Salas S; Zuluaga-Gómez A
    BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1144-7. PubMed ID: 19338552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Matched pair analysis of ureteroscopy vs. shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper ureteric calculi.
    Stewart GD; Bariol SV; Moussa SA; Smith G; Tolley DA
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 May; 61(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 17386062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrograde ureteroscopy for distal ureteric stone removal in children.
    De Dominicis M; Matarazzo E; Capozza N; Collura G; Caione P
    BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):1049-52. PubMed ID: 15839930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy as emergency treatment for acute renal failure caused by impacted ureteral calculi.
    Jiang H; Wu Z; Ding Q
    Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):504-7. PubMed ID: 18653216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The case for primary endoscopic management of upper urinary tract calculi: II. Cost and outcome assessment of 112 primary ureteral calculi.
    Grasso M; Beaghler M; Loisides P
    Urology; 1995 Mar; 45(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 7879330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
    Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
    World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.