BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

599 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15596191)

  • 1. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
    Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1165-70. PubMed ID: 15596191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.
    Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
    Urology; 2004 Sep; 64(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 15351582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Emmerlich V; Meves M; Altmannsberger HM; Becht E
    Eur Urol; 2004 Nov; 46(5):571-8. PubMed ID: 15474265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Han M; Partin AW; Zahurak M; Piantadosi S; Epstein JI; Walsh PC
    J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):517-23. PubMed ID: 12544300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng./ml. or less.
    Zlotta AR; Remzi M; Snow PB; Schulman CC; Marberger M; Djavan B
    J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1724-8. PubMed ID: 12686818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer.
    Cagiannos I; Karakiewicz P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Rabbani F; Gerigk C; Reuter V; Graefen M; Hammerer PG; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Kupelian P; Klein E; Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD; Morash CG; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
    J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1798-803. PubMed ID: 14532779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of neural networks and logistic regression analysis for predicting pathological stage in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a population based study.
    Borque A; Sanz G; Allepuz C; Plaza L; Gil P; Rioja LA
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1672-8. PubMed ID: 11586200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence.
    Capitanio U; Scattoni V; Freschi M; Briganti A; Salonia A; Gallina A; Colombo R; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    Eur Urol; 2008 Jul; 54(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 18314255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Horiguchi A; Nakashima J; Horiguchi Y; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Marumo K; Murai M
    Prostate; 2003 Jun; 56(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12746843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion based on the extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Briganti A; Chun FK; Salonia A; Gallina A; Farina E; Da Pozzo LF; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
    BJU Int; 2006 Oct; 98(4):788-93. PubMed ID: 16796698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-cultural validation of a prognostic tool: example of the Kattan preoperative nomogram as a predictor of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Rouprêt M; Hupertan V; Comperat E; Drouin SJ; Phé V; Xylinas E; Demanse D; Sibony M; Richard F; Cussenot O
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):813-7; discussion 817-8. PubMed ID: 19254280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percent of cores positive for cancer is a better preoperative predictor of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen.
    San Francisco IF; Regan MM; Olumi AF; DeWolf WC
    J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1492-9. PubMed ID: 15017206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of predicting long-term prostate specific antigen outcome based on early prostate specific antigen recurrence results after radical prostatectomy.
    Soergel TM; Koch MO; Foster RS; Bihrle R; Wahle G; Gardner T; Jung SH
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2198-201. PubMed ID: 11696735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of pathological stage in patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer: the new challenge.
    Veltri RW; Miller MC; Mangold LA; O'Dowd GJ; Epstein JI; Partin AW
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 12050500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preoperative PSA level significantly associated with interval to biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Gonzalez CM; Roehl KA; Antenor JV; Blunt LW; Han M; Catalona WJ
    Urology; 2004 Oct; 64(4):723-8. PubMed ID: 15491709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Should we replace the Gleason score with the amount of high-grade prostate cancer?
    Vis AN; Roemeling S; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
    Eur Urol; 2007 Apr; 51(4):931-9. PubMed ID: 16935413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Natural history of disease progression in patients who fail to achieve an undetectable prostate-specific antigen level after undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Rogers CG; Khan MA; Craig Miller M; Veltri RW; Partin AW
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 101(11):2549-56. PubMed ID: 15470681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.
    Weckermann D; Goppelt M; Dorn R; Wawroschek F; Harzmann R
    BJU Int; 2006 Jun; 97(6):1173-8. PubMed ID: 16686707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.