These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins. Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Atug F; Castle EP; Srivastav SK; Burgess SV; Thomas R; Davis R Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):866-71; discussion 871-2. PubMed ID: 16564614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality improvement in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer: impact of video documentation review on positive surgical margin. Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Saranchuk JW; Hassen WA; Trabulsi EJ; Reuter VE; Guillonneau B J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):765-8. PubMed ID: 15711265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of urethral stump length on continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Borin JF; Skarecky DW; Narula N; Ahlering TE Urology; 2007 Jul; 70(1):173-7. PubMed ID: 17656233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy. Ficarra V; Novara G; Secco S; D'Elia C; Boscolo-Berto R; Gardiman M; Cavalleri S; Artibani W J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2682-8. PubMed ID: 19836778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients. Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suture versus staple ligation of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Wu SD; Meeks JJ; Cashy J; Perry KT; Nadler RB BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 20067457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nerve sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy--effect of puboprostatic ligament preservation on early continence and positive margins. Stolzenburg JU; Liatsikos EN; Rabenalt R; Do M; Sakelaropoulos G; Horn LC; Truss MC Eur Urol; 2006 Jan; 49(1):103-11; discussion 111-2. PubMed ID: 16314031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Controlling the dorsal venous complex during robotic prostatectomy. Talug C; Josephson DY; Ruel NH; Lau C; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG Can J Urol; 2012 Feb; 19(1):6147-54. PubMed ID: 22316521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Zorn KC; Orvieto MA; Mikhail AA; Gofrit ON; Lin S; Schaeffer AJ; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 17320668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lateral view dissection of the prostato-urethral junction to reduce positive apical margin in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Sasaki H; Miki J; Kimura T; Sanuki K; Miki K; Takahashi H; Egawa S Int J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):664-9. PubMed ID: 19682106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program? White MA; De Haan AP; Stephens DD; Maatman TK; Maatman TJ Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 19167036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Zagaja GP; Sokoloff MH; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 16040100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of a large prostate gland on open and robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Chan RC; Barocas DA; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Smith JA; Cookson MS BJU Int; 2008 May; 101(9):1140-4. PubMed ID: 18399829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]