These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15597475)

  • 1. Legislation to address assisted human reproduction in New Zealand: the Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Bill, and Supplementary Order Paper Number 80.
    Daniels K
    N Z Bioeth J; 2003 Oct; 4(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 15597475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Privacy and assisted human reproduction: a discussion paper.
    Foster J; Slater B
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 15739319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The right to know one's genetic origin: can, should, or must a state that extends this right to adoptees extend an analogous right to children conceived with donor gametes?
    Chestney ES
    Tex Law Rev; 2001 Dec; 80(2):365-91. PubMed ID: 12680363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A need to know basis: record keeping, information access, and the Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
    Shelf A
    Hastings Law J; 2000 Jul; 51(5):1047-72. PubMed ID: 12449960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioethics and health law in New Zealand: bioethics commentary.
    Elkin S
    N Z Bioeth J; 2004 Feb; 5(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 15597485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time for a national approach to donor conception in Australia.
    Bennett B
    J Law Med; 2011 Sep; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 21988005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bioethics and health law in New Zealand. Bioethics commentary.
    Evans D
    N Z Bioeth J; 2001 Feb; 2(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 15586982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An overview of assisted reproductive technology regulation in Australia and New Zealand.
    Skene L
    Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 12656083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mum's the word: donor anonymity in assisted reproduction.
    Johnston J
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15739318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies.
    Bernier L; Grégoire D
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Dec; 30(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 15574437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regulation of assisted reproductive technology in the Netherlands.
    te Braake TA
    Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):93-122. PubMed ID: 12656080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The right to privacy and assisted reproductive technologies: a comparative study of the law of Germany and the U.S.
    Voss AS
    N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 2002; 21(2):229-305. PubMed ID: 15212072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bill C-13 The Assisted Human Reproduction Act: examining the arguments against a regulatory approach.
    Caulfield T
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 15739313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bill on use of human parts and assisted procreation makes progress in France.
    France
    Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Mar; 86():8-11. PubMed ID: 16145780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reviewing regulation of assisted reproductive technology in New South Wales: the Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007 (NSW).
    Smith M
    J Law Med; 2008 Aug; 16(1):120-31. PubMed ID: 18807800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflicting definitions of kinship: the challenge for state regulation of donor-assisted conception.
    Speirs JM
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2003; 9(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 14964206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Canada's Assisted Human Reproductive Act: is it scientific censorship, or a reasoned approach to the regulation of rapidly emerging reproductive technologies?
    Rasmussen C
    Sask Law Rev; 2004; 67(1):97-135. PubMed ID: 16485361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Professional self-regulation and guidelines in assisted reproduction.
    Chalmers D
    J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):414-28. PubMed ID: 12194473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Politics, prohibitions and the lost public perspective: a comment on Bill C-56: the Assisted Human Reproduction Act.
    Caulfield T
    Alta Law Rev; 2002 Sep; 40(2):451-63. PubMed ID: 16211737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Submission on draft legislation on assisted human reproduction.
    Canadian Bar Association. National Health Law and Family Law Sections
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 10(2):25-9. PubMed ID: 15739308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.