221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15597645)
1. Extraperitoneal standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Rozet F; Arroyo C; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Prapotnich D; Vallancien G
J Endourol; 2004 Sep; 18(7):605-9; discussion 609-10. PubMed ID: 15597645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases.
Rozet F; Galiano M; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Cathala N; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):908-11. PubMed ID: 16093985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.
Akand M; Erdogru T; Avci E; Ates M
Int J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 26212891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis.
Erdogru T; Teber D; Frede T; Marrero R; Hammady A; Seemann O; Rassweiler J
Eur Urol; 2004 Sep; 46(3):312-9; discussion 320. PubMed ID: 15306100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Results after 50 cases.
Bollens R; Vanden Bossche M; Roumeguere T; Damoun A; Ekane S; Hoffmann P; Zlotta AR; Schulman CC
Eur Urol; 2001 Jul; 40(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 11528178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: University of Leipzig technique.
Stolzenburg JU; Rabenalt R; Do M; Tannapfel A; Truss MC; Liatsikos EN
J Endourol; 2006 Nov; 20(11):925-9. PubMed ID: 17144866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - results of 200 consecutive cases in a Canadian medical institution.
Tse E; Knaus R
Can J Urol; 2004 Apr; 11(2):2172-85. PubMed ID: 15182406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures.
Stolzenburg JU; Rabenalt R; DO M; Ho K; Dorschner W; Waldkirch E; Jonas U; Schütz A; Horn L; Truss MC
J Urol; 2005 Oct; 174(4 Pt 1):1271-5; discussion 1275. PubMed ID: 16145391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: initial experience after 70 procedures.
Stolzenburg JU; Do M; Rabenalt R; Pfeiffer H; Horn L; Truss MC; Jonas U; Dorschner W
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2066-71. PubMed ID: 12771721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Washington University initial experience and prospective evaluation of quality of life.
Rehman J; Ragab MM; Venkatesh R; Landman J; Lee D; Chen C; Yan Y; Sundaram CP
J Endourol; 2004 Apr; 18(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 15225395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a case-control study at a single institution.
Grossi FS; Di Lena S; Barnaba D; Larocca L; Raguso M; Sallustio G; Raguso N
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2010 Jun; 82(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 20812535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of early oncologic results of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach.
Ruiz L; Salomon L; Hoznek A; Vordos D; Yiou R; de la Taille A; Abbou CC
Eur Urol; 2004 Jul; 46(1):50-4; discussion 54-6. PubMed ID: 15183547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: evolution of the technique and experience with 2400 cases.
Stolzenburg JU; Kallidonis P; Minh D; Dietel A; Häfner T; Dimitriou D; Al-Aown A; Kyriazis I; Liatsikos EN
J Endourol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1467-72. PubMed ID: 19698051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oncologic outcome and continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 3 years' follow-up in a "second generation center".
Galli S; Simonato A; Bozzola A; Gregori A; Lissiani A; Scaburri A; Gaboardi F
Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):859-65. PubMed ID: 16519991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases.
Rassweiler J; Sentker L; Seemann O; Hatzinger M; Rumpelt HJ
J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2101-8. PubMed ID: 11696715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an assessment of 156 cases.
Brown JA; Rodin D; Lee B; Dahl DM
Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 15708046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results.
Jacob F; Salomon L; Hoznek A; Bellot J; Antiphon P; Chopin DK; Abbou CC
Eur Urol; 2000 May; 37(5):615-20. PubMed ID: 10765103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients.
Greco F; Hoda MR; Wagner S; Reichelt O; Inferrera A; Magno C; Fornara P
BJU Int; 2011 Aug; 108(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 21091973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
