These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15597865)

  • 1. Controversial results downplay power plant mercury emissions.
    Renner R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Dec; 38(23):450A. PubMed ID: 15597865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of mercury emissions to the atmosphere from coal combustion, China.
    Zhang MQ; Zhu YC; Deng RW
    Ambio; 2002 Sep; 31(6):482-4. PubMed ID: 12436847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of mercury in rock varnish samples in areas impacted by coal-fired power plants.
    Nowinski P; Hodge VF; Gerstenberger S; Cizdziel JV
    Environ Pollut; 2013 Aug; 179():132-7. PubMed ID: 23669462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Atmospheric emissions estimation of Hg, As, and Se from coal-fired power plants in China, 2007.
    Tian H; Wang Y; Xue Z; Qu Y; Chai F; Hao J
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jul; 409(16):3078-81. PubMed ID: 21621816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of mercury emission from different sources to atmosphere in Chongqing, China.
    Wang D; He L; Wei S; Feng X
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Aug; 366(2-3):722-8. PubMed ID: 16219340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Staying ahead of the feds: EPA proposes cap-and-trade to cut back on mercury emissions, but many states think they have a quicker, better solution.
    Morandi L; Smith J
    State Legis; 2005 Jun; 31(6):14-7. PubMed ID: 15954242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mercury in Indian Thermal Coals.
    Das TB; Senapati RN; Agarwalla H
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2020 Sep; 105(3):502-512. PubMed ID: 32728825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial and temporal variability of atmospheric mercury concentrations emitted from a coal-fired power plant in Mexico.
    García GF; Álvarez HB; Echeverría RS; de Alba SR; Rueda VM; Dosantos EC; Cruz GV
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Sep; 67(9):973-985. PubMed ID: 28498787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control of mercury emissions from stationary coal combustion sources in China: Current status and recommendations.
    Hu Y; Cheng H
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Nov; 218():1209-1221. PubMed ID: 27596303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mercury emissions from geothermal power plants.
    Robertson DE; Crecelius EA; Fruchter JS; Ludwick JD
    Science; 1977 Jun; 196(4294):1094-7. PubMed ID: 860131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mercury emissions from coal-fired power stations: The current state of the art in the Netherlands.
    Meij R; te Winkel H
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):393-6. PubMed ID: 16289297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sources of mercury wet deposition in Eastern Ohio, USA.
    Keeler GJ; Landis MS; Norris GA; Christianson EM; Dvonch JT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Oct; 40(19):5874-81. PubMed ID: 17051773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mercury emission inventory and its spatial characteristics in the Pearl River Delta region, China.
    Zheng J; Ou J; Mo Z; Yin S
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Dec; 412-413():214-22. PubMed ID: 22078372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavior of mercury emissions from a commercial coal-fired power plant: the relationship between stack speciation and near-field plume measurements.
    Landis MS; Ryan JV; ter Schure AF; Laudal D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(22):13540-8. PubMed ID: 25325168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mercury speciation and emissions from coal combustion in Guiyang, Southwest China.
    Tang S; Feng X; Qiu J; Yin G; Yang Z
    Environ Res; 2007 Oct; 105(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 17517388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study on emission of hazardous trace elements in a 350 MW coal-fired power plant. Part 1. Mercury.
    Zhao S; Duan Y; Chen L; Li Y; Yao T; Liu S; Liu M; Lu J
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Oct; 229():863-870. PubMed ID: 28779897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. After the clean air mercury rule: prospects for reducing mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants.
    Milford JB; Pienciak A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Apr; 43(8):2669-73. PubMed ID: 19475932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of volatile organic compounds in emissions by coal-fired power stations from Spain.
    Fernández-Martínez G; López-Vilariño JM; López-Mahía P; Muniategui-Lorenzo S; Prada-Rodríguez D; Fernández-Fernández E
    Environ Technol; 2001 May; 22(5):567-75. PubMed ID: 11424734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of Emission Controls to Reduce the Atmospheric Concentrations of Mercury.
    Castro MS; Sherwell J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14000-7. PubMed ID: 26606506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mercury release during thermal treatment of two Chinese coal gangues.
    Guo S; Niu X; Zhai J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Oct; 24(30):23578-23583. PubMed ID: 28856563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.