BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15598219)

  • 1. Affected sib pair tests in inbred populations.
    Liu W; Weir BS
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 Nov; 68(Pt 6):606-19. PubMed ID: 15598219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Properties of the transmission-disequilibrium test in the presence of inbreeding.
    Génin E; Todorov AA; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 22(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 11788958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting linkage disequilibrium in the presence of locus heterogeneity.
    Wang D; Huang J
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 May; 70(Pt 3):397-409. PubMed ID: 16674561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of association methods for dense marker data.
    Bacanu SA; Nelson MR; Ehm MG
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Dec; 32(8):791-9. PubMed ID: 18551558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global tests for linkage.
    el Galta R; van Houwelingen HC; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 19197957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Affected kin-pair IBD methods: genetic models.
    Motro U; Thomson G
    Genet Epidemiol; 1991; 8(5):317-27. PubMed ID: 1761204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A sliding-window weighted linkage disequilibrium test.
    Yang HC; Lin CY; Fann CS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):531-45. PubMed ID: 16830340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interpretation of simultaneous linkage and family-based association tests in genome screens.
    Chung RH; Hauser ER; Martin ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 17123303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The power of two-locus affected sib-pair linkage analysis to detect interacting disease loci.
    Hallgrímsdóttir IB; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17654608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of parental relationships in maximum lod score affected sib-pair method.
    Leutenegger AL; Génin E; Thompson EA; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Nov; 23(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 12432507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power of transmission/disequilibrium tests in admixed populations.
    Li MX; Jiang L; Song YQ; Sham PC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 32(5):434-44. PubMed ID: 18278814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci.
    Ryman N; Palm S; André C; Carvalho GR; Dahlgren TG; Jorde PE; Laikre L; Larsson LC; Palmé A; Ruzzante DE
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2031-45. PubMed ID: 16780422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical power of association using the extreme discordant phenotype design.
    Zhang G; Nebert DW; Chakraborty R; Jin L
    Pharmacogenet Genomics; 2006 Jun; 16(6):401-13. PubMed ID: 16708049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regional inference with averaged P values increases the power to detect linkage.
    Goldin LR; Chase GA; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 10446463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multipoint linkage detection in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Chiu YF; Liang KY; Beaty TH
    Biostatistics; 2002 Jun; 3(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 12933613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the effect of inbreeding among founders in linkage analysis.
    Hössjer O
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Sep; 70(2):146-63. PubMed ID: 16828135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A note on the asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage tests.
    Wang K
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 Jul; 68(Pt 4):367-75. PubMed ID: 15225162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing association and linkage using affected-sib-parent study designs.
    Millstein J; Siegmund KD; Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 29(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 16121357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing association with interactions by partitioning chi-squares.
    Yang Y; He C; Ott J
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 18798840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.
    Moskvina V; O'Donovan MC
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 17483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.