501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15598287)
1. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).
Walker JL; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 16890545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Colposcopic verification of cytologic smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance].
Pityński K; Basta A; Szczudrawa A; Strama M; Piwowarska E
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10375923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of cytological screening for cancers and precancerous lesions of the cervix].
Boman F; Duhamel A; Trinh QD; Deken V; Leroy JL; Beuscart R
Bull Cancer; 2003 Jul; 90(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 12957806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of normal colposcopy after an abnormal cervical smear report.
Luesley D; Downey G
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 19098604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of HIV infection on atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Duerr A; Paramsothy P; Jamieson DJ; Heilig CM; Klein RS; Cu-Uvin S; Schuman P; Anderson JR;
Clin Infect Dis; 2006 Mar; 42(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16477565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. HPV DNA testing in the triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): cost comparison of two methods.
Layfield LJ; Qureshi MN
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Aug; 33(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 16007672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance qualified: a follow-up study.
Kline MJ; Davey DD
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 8725142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
Sherman ME; Schiffman M; Herrero R; Kelly D; Bratti C; Mango LJ; Alfaro M; Hutchinson ML; Mena F; Hildesheim A; Morales J; Greenberg MD; Balmaceda I; Lorincz AT
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in postmenopausal women.
Chhieng DC; Elgert P; Cohen JM; Cangiarella JF
Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11241259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atypical reparative change on cervical/vaginal smears may be associated with dysplasia.
Rimm DL; Gmitro S; Frable WJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 8725141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
Cheng RF; Hernandez E; Anderson LL; Heller PB; Shank R
J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):922-8. PubMed ID: 10589401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Triage of women with ASCUS and LSIL cytology: use of qualitative assessment of p16INK4a positive cells to identify patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Wentzensen N; Bergeron C; Cas F; Vinokurova S; von Knebel Doeberitz M
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 17186505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
