479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15598298)
1. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Gelisen O; Dilbaz B; Ozturk N; Haberal A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
Culver J; Strauss RA; Brody S; Dorman K; Timlin S; McMahon MJ
Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA; Aimakhu CO; Oladokun A; Akindele FO; Adeniji OI; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 16752669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Owolabi AT; Kuti O; Ogunlola IO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16234141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas.
Al-Taani MI
East Mediterr Health J; 2004; 10(4-5):547-53. PubMed ID: 16335645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
Guinn DA; Davies JK; Jones RO; Sullivan L; Wolf D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 15295370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bishop score and the outcome of labor induction with misoprostol.
Szczesny W; Kjøllesdal M; Karlsson B; Nielsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(5):579-82. PubMed ID: 16752237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
Rust OA; Greybush M; Atlas RO; Jones KJ; Balducci J
J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol.
Crane JM; Delaney T; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D; Young DC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 15280123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1616-9. PubMed ID: 10871486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness and safety of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour in unfavourable cervix in 3rd trimester.
Abbasi N; Danish N; Shakoor F; Parveen Z; Bilal SA
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2008; 20(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 19610511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
