These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15598302)

  • 1. If at first you don't succeed, try, try, try again: a successful birth after 37 cycles of assisted reproductive technology over 11 years.
    Kovacs GT; Howlett D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):580-2. PubMed ID: 15598302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Openness on results of assisted reproductive techniques: yes, but...].
    Belaisch-Allart J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 May; 34(5):430-1; discussion 429. PubMed ID: 16630738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the mode of assisted reproductive technology conception on obstetric outcomes for survivors of the vanishing twin syndrome.
    La Sala GB; Villani MT; Nicoli A; Gallinelli A; Nucera G; Blickstein I
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):247-9. PubMed ID: 16716323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.
    Reddy UM; Wapner RJ; Rebar RW; Tasca RJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 17400861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Re: outcomes from treatment of infertility with natural procreative technology in an Irish general practice.
    Sills ES; Walsh DJ; Walsh AP
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2009; 22(1):94-5; author reply 95-6. PubMed ID: 19124642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Male age negatively impacts embryo development and reproductive outcome in donor oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Frattarelli JL; Miller KA; Miller BT; Elkind-Hirsch K; Scott RT
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 17765235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Referral for assisted reproductive technology: indications and treatment outcome.
    Adesiyun AG
    Ann Afr Med; 2011; 10(4):316-8. PubMed ID: 22064261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Newborns from assisted reproductive technology at the Hospital de São João].
    Teixeira A; Calejo L; Vasconcellos G; Rocha G; Centeno MJ; Guimarães H
    Acta Med Port; 2005; 18(6):409-15. PubMed ID: 16684480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Life table (survival) analysis to generate cumulative pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction: an alternative method of calculating the cumulative pregnancy rate in assisted reproduction technology.
    Wang JX
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Jan; 21(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16155080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of heterotopic and intrauterine-only pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technologies in the United States from 1999 to 2002.
    Clayton HB; Schieve LA; Peterson HB; Jamieson DJ; Reynolds MA; Wright VC
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 17113092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recombinant human leukemia inhibitory factor does not improve implantation and pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive techniques in women with recurrent unexplained implantation failure.
    Brinsden PR; Alam V; de Moustier B; Engrand P
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4 Suppl):1445-7. PubMed ID: 18710712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doubling time of urine human chorionic gonadotropin after assisted reproductive technology.
    Fujiwara H; Motoyama M; Koike T; Ogawa S; Shibahara H; Suzuki M
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Oct; 84(4):1040-2. PubMed ID: 16213870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Openness on results of assisted reproductive techniques: yes].
    Pouly JL
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 May; 34(5):432-3 discussion 429. PubMed ID: 16644260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Increasing success of assisted reproduction].
    Nau JY
    Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Jun; 5(207):1336. PubMed ID: 19626935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-specific success rate for women undertaking their first assisted reproduction technology treatment using their own oocytes in Australia, 2002-2005.
    Wang YA; Healy D; Black D; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1633-8. PubMed ID: 18441345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2003.
    Nygren KG; Sullivan E; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; Adamson GD; de Mouzon J
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2209-22, 2222.e1-17. PubMed ID: 21536284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative birth weights of singletons born after assisted reproduction and natural conception in previously infertile women.
    De Geyter C; De Geyter M; Steimann S; Zhang H; Holzgreve W
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Mar; 21(3):705-12. PubMed ID: 16284064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.