These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15598452)
1. Imaging knee position using MRI, RSA/CT and 3D digitisation. McPherson A; Kärrholm J; Pinskerova V; Sosna A; Martelli S J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 15598452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility measurements of three methods for calculating in vivo MR-based knee kinematics. Lansdown DA; Zaid M; Pedoia V; Subburaj K; Souza R; Benjamin C; Li X J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25545617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantification of the 3D relative movement of external marker sets vs. bones based on magnetic resonance imaging. Sangeux M; Marin F; Charleux F; Dürselen L; Ho Ba Tho MC Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):984-91. PubMed ID: 16844273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Registration of 6-DOFs electrogoniometry and CT medical imaging for 3D joint modeling. Van Sint Jan S; Salvia P; Hilal I; Sholukha V; Rooze M; Clapworthy G J Biomech; 2002 Nov; 35(11):1475-84. PubMed ID: 12413966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A reproducible method for studying three-dimensional knee kinematics. Hagemeister N; Parent G; Van de Putte M; St-Onge N; Duval N; de Guise J J Biomech; 2005 Sep; 38(9):1926-31. PubMed ID: 15996675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurement of tibiofemoral kinematics using highly accelerated 3D radial sampling. Kaiser J; Bradford R; Johnson K; Wieben O; Thelen DG Magn Reson Med; 2013 May; 69(5):1310-6. PubMed ID: 22693040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EOS orthopaedic imaging system to study patellofemoral kinematics: assessment of uncertainty. Azmy C; Guérard S; Bonnet X; Gabrielli F; Skalli W Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Feb; 96(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 20170853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MRI of the knee at 3T: first clinical results with an isotropic PDfs-weighted 3D-TSE-sequence. Notohamiprodjo M; Horng A; Pietschmann MF; Müller PE; Horger W; Park J; Crispin A; del Olmo JR; Weckbach S; Herrmann KA; Reiser MF; Glaser C Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):585-97. PubMed ID: 19668001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advanced Imaging Techniques in the Knee: Benefits and Limitations of New Rapid Acquisition Strategies for Routine Knee MRI. Garwood ER; Recht MP; White LM AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):552-560. PubMed ID: 28639870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical value of routine use of thin-section 3D MRI using 3D FSE sequences with a variable flip angle technique for internal derangements of the knee joint at 3T. Kudo H; Inaoka T; Kitamura N; Nakatsuka T; Kasuya S; Kasai R; Tozawa M; Nakagawa K; Terada H Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1309-17. PubMed ID: 23684241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3-D/2-D registration of CT and MR to X-ray images. Tomazevic D; Likar B; Slivnik T; Pernus F IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Nov; 22(11):1407-16. PubMed ID: 14606674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of MRI vs CT imaging with particular reference to patient specific templates for total knee replacement surgery. White D; Chelule KL; Seedhom BB Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 18680138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT- and MRI-based volumetry of resected liver specimen: comparison to intraoperative volume and weight measurements and calculation of conversion factors. Karlo C; Reiner CS; Stolzmann P; Breitenstein S; Marincek B; Weishaupt D; Frauenfelder T Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e107-11. PubMed ID: 19782490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Markerless Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis for in vivo implant migration measurement using three dimensional surface models to represent bone. Seehaus F; Olender GD; Kaptein BL; Ostermeier S; Hurschler C J Biomech; 2012 May; 45(8):1540-5. PubMed ID: 22465625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging for in vivo assessment of three-dimensional patellar tracking. Fellows RA; Hill NA; Gill HS; MacIntyre NJ; Harrison MM; Ellis RE; Wilson DR J Biomech; 2005 Aug; 38(8):1643-52. PubMed ID: 15958222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Soft tissue artifact compensation in knee kinematics by double anatomical landmark calibration: performance of a novel method during selected motor tasks. Cappello A; Stagni R; Fantozzi S; Leardini A IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 52(6):992-8. PubMed ID: 15977729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do dynamic-based MR knee kinematics methods produce the same results as static methods? d'Entremont AG; Nordmeyer-Massner JA; Bos C; Wilson DR; Pruessmann KP Magn Reson Med; 2013 Jun; 69(6):1634-44. PubMed ID: 22847783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A method for measurement of joint kinematics in vivo by registration of 3-D geometric models with cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging data. Barrance PJ; Williams GN; Novotny JE; Buchanan TS J Biomech Eng; 2005 Oct; 127(5):829-37. PubMed ID: 16248313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Registering spherical navigators with spherical harmonic expansions to measure three-dimensional rotations in magnetic resonance imaging. Costa AF; Yen YF; Drangova M Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Feb; 28(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 19755205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid 3D-T1rho mapping of the knee joint at 3.0T with parallel imaging. Pakin SK; Xu J; Schweitzer ME; Regatte RR Magn Reson Med; 2006 Sep; 56(3):563-71. PubMed ID: 16894582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]