BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 155985)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of automated processing of electrocardiograms by the Veterans Administration program (AVA 3.4).
    Brohet CR; Richman HG
    Am J Cardiol; 1979 Jun; 43(6):1167-74. PubMed ID: 155985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic accuracy of clinicians, the VA program and the Mount Sinai program in the interpretation of electrocardiograms as compared with clinicopathological data.
    Bourdillon PJ; Kilpatrick D
    Adv Cardiol; 1978; 21():165-7. PubMed ID: 145788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinicians, the Mount Sinai program and the Veterans' Administration program evaluated against clinico-pathological data derived independently of the electrocardiogram.
    Bourdillon PJ; Kilpatrick D
    Eur J Cardiol; 1978 Nov; 8(4-5):395-412. PubMed ID: 152709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The program of the cooperative study of the Veterans Administration.
    Cornfield J; Pipberger HV; Dunn RA
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975; 5(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 126890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical application of a second generation electrocardiographic computer program.
    Pipberger HV; McCaughan D; Littmann D; Pipberger HA; Cornfield J; Dunn RA; Batchlor CD; Berson AS
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 May; 35(5):597-608. PubMed ID: 1092149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer interpretation of pediatric orthogonal electrocardiograms: statistical and deterministic classification methods.
    Brohet CR; Robert A; Derwael C; Fesler R; Stijns M; Vliers A; Braasseur LA
    Circulation; 1984 Aug; 70(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 6234110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic criteria for computer-aided electrocardiographic 15-lead system. Evaluation using 12 leads and Frank orthogonal leads with vector display.
    Talbot S; Dreifus LS; Watanabe Y; Chiang R; Morris K; Reich M
    Br Heart J; 1976 Dec; 38(12):1247-61. PubMed ID: 137730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a computer programme for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Landelius J; Nordgren L
    Ups J Med Sci; 1979; 84(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 155918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative diagnostic performance of the Telemed computer ECG program.
    Bernard P; Chaitman BR; Scholl JM; Val PG; Chabot M
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Jan; 16(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 6220102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of an ECG computer analysis program on the cardiologist's interpretation. A cooperative study.
    Milliken JA; Pipberger H; Pipberger HV; Araoye MA; Ari R; Burggraf GW; Fletcher RD; Katz RJ; Lopez EA; McCans JL; Silver AM
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Apr; 16(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 6222129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrocardiographic diagnosis using digital differentiation.
    Fischhof TJ
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1982 Sep; 13(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 6215362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multigroup diagnosis of electrocardiograms.
    Cornfield J; Dunn RA; Batchlor CD; Pipberger HV
    Comput Biomed Res; 1973 Feb; 6(1):97-120. PubMed ID: 4266618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. 3. Reproducibility testing and the sources of program errors.
    Bailey JJ; Horton M; Itscoitz SB
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 4276020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [ECG evaluation by the computer using the USPHS program (author's transl)].
    So CS
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1975 Aug; 117(34):1339-44. PubMed ID: 126374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of the IBM (12-lead) and Royal Infirmary (orthogonal three-lead) ECG computer programs.
    Macfarlane PW; Melville DI; Horton MR; Bailey JJ
    Circulation; 1981 Feb; 63(2):354-9. PubMed ID: 6450002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
    Morisbak B; Gjesdal K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer program for diagnostic evaluation of electrocardiograms.
    Wartak J; Milliken JA; Karchmar J
    Comput Biomed Res; 1971 Jun; 4(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 4935055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Computer analysis of electrocardiograms using various programmes (author's transl)].
    Meyer J; Heinrich KW; Merx W; Effert S
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1974 Jun; 99(23):1213-23. PubMed ID: 4276473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Letter: Evaluating computer ECG programs.
    Pipberger HV; Cornfield J
    Circulation; 1974 Dec; 50(6):1287-8. PubMed ID: 4279148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.