These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15599194)

  • 1. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Huss M; Vickers DA; Glasberg BR; Alcántara JI
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Aug; 34(4):205-24. PubMed ID: 10997450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
    Digiovanni JJ; Pratt RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):663-70. PubMed ID: 21376007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of an aided TEN test for diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.
    Marriage J; Moore BC; Ogg V; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 18344872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of the TEN test to hearing-impaired teenagers with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Killen T; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 42(8):465-74. PubMed ID: 14658854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are There Cochlear Dead Regions Involved in Hearing Loss after Cisplatin Ototoxicity?
    Schultz C; Pecora Liberman PH; Schmidt Goffi-Gomez MV
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(5):253-257. PubMed ID: 31661686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Vinay ; Moore BC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 17496673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compensated active noise cancellation earphone for audiometric screening tests in noisy environments.
    Chang HY; Luo CH; Lo TS; Tai CC
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Nov; 58(11):747-753. PubMed ID: 31215819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the noise attenuation of three audiometric earphones, with additional data on masking near threshold.
    Berger EH; Killion MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1392-403. PubMed ID: 2808913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reference thresholds for the TEN(HL) test for people with normal hearing.
    Hansen AS; Raen Ø; Moore BCJ
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Sep; 56(9):672-676. PubMed ID: 28394651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimal response levels for visual reinforcement audiometry in infants.
    Parry G; Hacking C; Bamford J; Day J
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Oct; 42(7):413-7. PubMed ID: 14582637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting outcomes on the TEN (SPL) test in adults with hearing loss.
    Hornsby BW; Dundas JA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Apr; 20(4):251-63. PubMed ID: 19927697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.
    Leong UC; Schwarz DM; Henry KS; Carney LH
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 31985535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of age, test frequency and level on thresholds for the TEN(HL) test for people with normal hearing.
    Vinay ; Sandhya ; Moore BCJ
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 59(12):915-920. PubMed ID: 32628054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-frequency (8 to 16 kHz) reference thresholds and intrasubject threshold variability relative to ototoxicity criteria using a Sennheiser HDA 200 earphone.
    Frank T
    Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 11324845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.