These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15599194)

  • 41. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Hoover BM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3275-84. PubMed ID: 12822800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI
    Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 11527034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of background noise on earphone thresholds.
    Frank T; Williams DL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 8318711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of bone-conduction harmonic distortions on hearing thresholds.
    Eichenauer A; Dillon H; Clinch B; Loi T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL96-102. PubMed ID: 25096153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Temporary threshold shifts at 1500 and 2000 Hz induced by loud voice signals communicated through earphones in the pinball industry.
    Idota N; Horie S; Tsutsui T; Inoue J
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Oct; 54(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 20584863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance for a priori criteria and for multifrequency audiometric standards.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA
    Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):345-62. PubMed ID: 10466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Reassessment of cochlear dead regions in hearing-impaired teenagers with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Munro KJ; Felthouse C; Moore BC; Kapadia S
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Aug; 44(8):470-7. PubMed ID: 16149242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Audiometric earphone discomfort level and hearing aid saturation sound pressure level for a 90 decibel input signal (SSPL90) as measured in the human ear canal.
    Leijon A; Harford E; Lidén G; Ringdahl A; Dahlberg AK
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 6618037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. IV. Interaural latency differences (wave V) in cochlear hearing loss.
    Rosenhamer HJ; Lindström B; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 7280543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Distortion product otoacoustic emission and auditory brain stem response measures of pediatric sensorineural hearing loss with islands of normal sensitivity.
    Balfour PB; Pillion JP; Gaskin AE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Dec; 19(6):463-72. PubMed ID: 9867294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Patient selection for incus body coupling of a totally implantable middle ear implant.
    Zenner HP; Baumann JW; Reischl G; Plinkert P; Zimmermann R; Mauz PS; Limberger A; Maassen MM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Aug; 123(6):683-96. PubMed ID: 12953766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Long-term audiometric follow-up of click-evoked auditory brainstem response in hearing-impaired infants.
    Schoonhoven R; Lamoré PJ; de Laat JA; Grote JJ
    Audiology; 2000; 39(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 10905399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reconstruction of the audiogram using brain stem responses and high-pass noise masking.
    Don M; Eggermont JJ; Brackmann DE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1979; (3 Pt 2 Suppl 57):1-20. PubMed ID: 110210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. High-frequency audiometry: test reliability and procedural considerations.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Beauchaine KA; Kalberer A; Kelly WJ; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Feb; 85(2):879-87. PubMed ID: 2926002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Amplitude variation in calibrated audiometer systems in clinical simulations.
    Barlow C; Davison L; Ashmore M; Weinstein R
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(72):299-305. PubMed ID: 25209040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns: II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Alcántara JI; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):103-16. PubMed ID: 12031520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Nord-Trøndelag Norway Audiometric Survey 1996-98: unscreened thresholds and prevalence of hearing impairment for adults > 20 years.
    Borchgrevink HM; Tambs K; Hoffman HJ
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(28):1-15. PubMed ID: 16417702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.