These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15599574)

  • 1. [Position paper on quality standards in echocardiography].
    Hoffmann R;
    Z Kardiol; 2004 Dec; 93(12):975-86. PubMed ID: 15599574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A structured report data set for documentation of echocardiographic studies--Update 2004].
    Voelker W;
    Z Kardiol; 2004 Dec; 93(12):987-1004. PubMed ID: 15599575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The value proposition of structured reporting in interventional radiology.
    Durack JC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):734-8. PubMed ID: 25247937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The dilemma of data flood - reducing costs and increasing quality control].
    Gassmann B
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2012 Sep; 101(18):1197-202. PubMed ID: 22945822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Implementation of recommendations for the diagnosis of heart failure].
    Scherer M
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 May; 135(20):1036. PubMed ID: 20461665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Implementation of recommendations for the diagnosis of heart failure].
    Erdmann E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 May; 135(20):1036. PubMed ID: 20461664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality assurance in echocardiography. Three-level system in formation and qualifying and concept of an external quality review].
    Fehske W; Buck T; Hagendorff A; von Bardeleben RS; Voelker W; Heinemann S
    Z Kardiol; 2005 Jan; 94(1):61-73; quiz 74. PubMed ID: 15668833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. American Society of Echocardiography minimum standards for the cardiac sonographer: a position paper.
    Bierig SM; Ehler D; Knoll ML; Waggoner AD;
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 May; 19(5):471-4. PubMed ID: 16644428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the logistics of interpretive radiology reporting: moving beyond procrustes.
    Brenner RJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Aug; 6(8):544-6. PubMed ID: 19643379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: "Improving the quality of radiology reporting: a physician survey to define the target" (J Am Coll Radiol 2004;1:497-505).
    Stolberg HO
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Sep; 1(9):700-1. PubMed ID: 17411684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Echocardiographic imaging in clinical trials: American Society of Echocardiography Standards for echocardiography core laboratories: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
    Douglas PS; DeCara JM; Devereux RB; Duckworth S; Gardin JM; Jaber WA; Morehead AJ; Oh JK; Picard MH; Solomon SD; Wei K; Weissman NJ; ;
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2009 Jul; 22(7):755-65. PubMed ID: 19560654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing the capacity gap in radiology reporting.
    Halliday K; Maskell G
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2019 May; 80(5):244-245. PubMed ID: 31059342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structured Reporting in the Academic Setting: What the Referring Clinician Wants.
    Lather JD; Che Z; Saltzman B; Bieszczad J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 May; 15(5):772-775. PubMed ID: 29483053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring quality--why the numbers don't add up.
    Kirsch M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Mar; 101(3):417-9. PubMed ID: 16542273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maintaining quality control using a radiological digital X-ray dashboard.
    Minnigh TR; Gallet J
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Mar; 22(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 18270779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality improvement guidelines for the reporting and archiving of interventional radiology procedures.
    Omary RA; Bettmann MA; Cardella JF; Bakal CW; Schwartzberg MS; Sacks D; Rholl KS; Meranze SG; Lewis CA
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2002 Sep; 13(9 Pt 1):879-81. PubMed ID: 12354820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of medical data registries.
    Morin RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1191. PubMed ID: 25444071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Nursing structure inquiry--a chance for quality assurance: learning from documentation].
    Braamt U
    Pflege Z; 2006 May; 59(5):299-301. PubMed ID: 16759071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Updated quality requirements regarding secondary differentiated ultrasound examination in prenatal diagnostics (= DEGUM level II) in the period from 18 + 0 to 21 + 6 weeks of gestation].
    Merz E; Eichhorn KH; von Kaisenberg C; Schramm T;
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(6):593-6. PubMed ID: 23147272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Quality in arthroplasty].
    Stöckle U; Wirtz DC
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2015 Apr; 153(2):141. PubMed ID: 25874390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.