BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15600005)

  • 1. Clinical trial design in oncology: assessment of outcomes.
    Gebski V
    Lancet Oncol; 2004 Dec; 5(12):761-3. PubMed ID: 15600005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. N-of-1 trials in oncology.
    Collette L; Tombal B
    Lancet Oncol; 2015 Aug; 16(8):885-6. PubMed ID: 26248830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality-of-life outcomes in oncology.
    Siddiqui F; Kachnic LA; Movsas B
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 20(1):165-85. PubMed ID: 16580562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intravenous immunoglobulin in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a dose-finding trial.
    Khan OA; Tselis A; Boster A
    Neurology; 2009 Jun; 72(24):2134; author reply 2134-5. PubMed ID: 19528523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pathology is a necessary and informative tool in oncology clinical trials.
    Nagtegaal ID; West NP; van Krieken JH; Quirke P
    J Pathol; 2014 Jan; 232(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 24037805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical trial design in oncology: protocol design.
    Sullivan R
    Lancet Oncol; 2004 Dec; 5(12):759. PubMed ID: 15581549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Health related quality of life and endpoints in oncology].
    Bonnetain F
    Cancer Radiother; 2010 Oct; 14(6-7):515-8. PubMed ID: 20674446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical trial design in oncology: statistical power.
    Gallo C; Perrone F
    Lancet Oncol; 2004 Dec; 5(12):760-1. PubMed ID: 15600004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating patient-centered outcomes in the randomized controlled trial and beyond: informing the future with lessons from the past.
    Booth CM
    Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Dec; 16(24):5963-71. PubMed ID: 21169249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Conducting a cost-effectiveness trial in oncology: justification and method].
    Lejeune C; Binquet C; Bonnetain F
    Bull Cancer; 2009 May; 96(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 19435689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A three-outcome design for randomized comparative phase II clinical trials.
    Hong S; Wang Y
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3525-34. PubMed ID: 17262879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian predictive sample size selection design for single-arm exploratory clinical trials.
    Teramukai S; Daimon T; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4243-54. PubMed ID: 22807115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dealing with multiple endpoints.
    Dueck A; Novotny PJ
    Curr Probl Cancer; 2006; 30(6):298-306. PubMed ID: 17123881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data handling in cancer clinical trials-how we can minimize potential biases.
    Sakamoto J; Teramukai S
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2002 Jan; 32(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11932354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing of evaluation bias for progression free survival endpoint in oncology clinical trials.
    Sun Y; Wu W; Sargent D
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(22):3923-32. PubMed ID: 27089832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Active-controlled, non-inferiority trials in oncology: arbitrary limits, infeasible sample sizes and uninformative data analysis. is there another way?
    Carroll KJ
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 17128427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Translating clinical trials into meaningful outcomes.
    LoRusso PM; Schnipper LE; Stewart DJ; Boerner SA; Averbuch SD; Wolf W
    Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Dec; 16(24):5951-5. PubMed ID: 21169247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design of phase II cancer trials using a continuous endpoint of change in tumor size: application to a study of sorafenib and erlotinib in non small-cell lung cancer.
    Karrison TG; Maitland ML; Stadler WM; Ratain MJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1455-61. PubMed ID: 17895472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early average change in tumor size in a phase 2 trial: efficient endpoint or false promise?
    Rubinstein LV; Dancey JE; Korn EL; Smith MA; Wright JJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1422-3. PubMed ID: 17895470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endpoints for clinical trials and revised assessment in neuro-oncology.
    Butowski N; Chang SM
    Curr Opin Neurol; 2012 Dec; 25(6):780-5. PubMed ID: 23007010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.