227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15602747)
1. Perineural invasion in prostate cancer biopsies is not associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins.
Cannon GM; Pound CR; Landsittel DP; Bastacky SI; Dhir R; Becich MJ; Nelson JB
Prostate; 2005 Jun; 63(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 15602747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The New York University nerve sparing algorithm decreases the rate of positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shah O; Robbins DA; Melamed J; Lepor H
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2147-52. PubMed ID: 12771737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic significance of the diameter of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Maru N; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Wheeler TM
Hum Pathol; 2001 Aug; 32(8):828-33. PubMed ID: 11521227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex hormone-binding globulin is a significant predictor of extracapsular extension in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Salonia A; Gallina A; Briganti A; Zanni G; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Colombo R; Bertini R; Freschi M; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2011 Apr; 107(8):1243-9. PubMed ID: 20883480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does site specific labeling of sextant biopsy cores predict the site of extracapsular extension in radical prostatectomy surgical specimen.
Taneja SS; Penson DF; Epelbaum A; Handler T; Lepor H
J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1352-7; discussion 1357-8. PubMed ID: 10492195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perineural invasion is a prognostic factor for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Jeon HG; Bae J; Yi JS; Hwang IS; Lee SE; Lee E
Int J Urol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):682-6. PubMed ID: 19602004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymphovascular invasion is a pathological feature of biologically aggressive disease in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.
Shariat SF; Khoddami SM; Saboorian H; Koeneman KS; Sagalowsky AI; Cadeddu JA; McConnell JD; Holmes MN; Roehrborn CG
J Urol; 2004 Mar; 171(3):1122-7. PubMed ID: 14767284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perineural invasion on prostate biopsy does not predict adverse pathological outcome.
Elharram M; Margel D; Finelli A; Trachtenberg J; Evans A; van der Kwast TH; Sweet JM; Fleshner N
Can J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(6):6567-72. PubMed ID: 23228294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Lepor H; Kaci L
Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 15028445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy.
DeLancey JO; Wood DP; He C; Montgomery JS; Weizer AZ; Miller DC; Jacobs BL; Montie JE; Hollenbeck BK; Skolarus TA
Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):354-7. PubMed ID: 23374801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate.
Brown JA; Rodin DM; Harisinghani M; Dahl DM
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18640062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Limited value of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens as a predictor of biochemical recurrence in Japanese men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Eto H; Hara I
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2005 Apr; 51(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 15912782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure.
Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; Graefen M; Erbersdobler A; Haese A; Huland H
Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 15661411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are prostate needle biopsies predictive of the laterality of significant cancer and positive surgical margins?
Frota R; Stein RJ; Turna B; Kamoi K; Lin YC; Magi-Galluzzi C; Aron M; Gill IS
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1599-603. PubMed ID: 19583724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sextant prostate biopsies predict side and sextant site of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.
Elliott SP; Shinohara K; Logan SL; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 12050501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Secin FP; Serio A; Bianco FJ; Karanikolas NT; Kuroiwa K; Vickers A; Touijer K; Guillonneau B
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 17098356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-operative prostate examination: predictive value and effect on margin status.
Rapp DE; Orvieto MA; Lucioni A; Gong EM; Shalhav AL; Brendler CB
BJU Int; 2005 Nov; 96(7):1005-8. PubMed ID: 16225517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination.
Tsuzuki T; Hernandez DJ; Aydin H; Trock B; Walsh PC; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):450-3. PubMed ID: 15643200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Labanaris AP; Zugor V; Takriti S; Smiszek R; Engelhard K; Nutzel R; Kuhn R
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18759166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
