151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1560277)
1. Nursing intensity. Going beyond patient classification.
Phillips CY; Castorr A; Prescott PA; Soeken K
J Nurs Adm; 1992 Apr; 22(4):46-52. PubMed ID: 1560277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nursing intensity: needed today for more than staffing.
Prescott PA
Nurs Econ; 1991; 9(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 1956428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of workload estimates using three methods of patient classification.
O'Brien-Pallas L; Leatt P; Deber R; Till J
Can J Nurs Adm; 1989; 2(3):16-23. PubMed ID: 2486682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Different systems, different costs? An examination of the comparability of workload measurement systems.
O'Brien-Pallas L; Cockerill R; Leatt P
J Nurs Adm; 1992 Dec; 22(12):17-22. PubMed ID: 1469483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship of direct nursing care hours to DRG and severity of illness.
Bostrom J; Mitchell M
Nurs Econ; 1991; 9(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 1902555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient classification systems capture nursing costs.
Ruman JM; Nelson DL
Healthc Financ Manage; 1987 Jul; 41(7):84-6, 88. PubMed ID: 10282638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient classification in the postanesthesia care unit.
Allen J
J Post Anesth Nurs; 1990 Aug; 5(4):228-38. PubMed ID: 2388167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple shift patient classification: is it necessary?
Kinley J; Cronenwett LR
J Nurs Adm; 1987 Feb; 17(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 3102705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Issues in nursing labor costs allocation.
Barhyte DY; Glandon GL
J Nurs Adm; 1988 Dec; 18(12):16-9. PubMed ID: 3193227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient classification system: an optimization approach.
Walts LM; Kapadia AS
Health Care Manage Rev; 1996; 21(4):75-82. PubMed ID: 8922967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nursing resource definition in DRGs. RIMS/Nursing Acuity Project Group.
Diers D; Bozzo J
Nurs Econ; 1997; 15(3):124-30, 137. PubMed ID: 9305112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nurse staffing methodologies: the relationship between quality and cost.
Jenkins E
Aust J Adv Nurs; 1983; 1(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 6559592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Costing out nursing: combining PCSs (patient classification systems), DRGs, and standards of care.
Kyle BA; Kinder S
Health Care Superv; 1990 Jan; 8(2):46-56. PubMed ID: 10113073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do DRG reimbursement rates reflect nursing costs?
Mowry MM; Korpman RA
J Nurs Adm; 1985; 15(7-8):29-35. PubMed ID: 3926966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Management of nursing intensity.
Thompson JD; Diers D
Nurs Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 23(3):473-92. PubMed ID: 3138665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computerization of patient acuity and nursing care planning. New approach to improved patient care and cost-effective staffing.
Adams R; Duchene P
J Nurs Adm; 1985 Apr; 15(4):11-7. PubMed ID: 3845089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new generation patient classification system.
Giovannetti P; Johnson JM
J Nurs Adm; 1990 May; 20(5):33-40. PubMed ID: 2335788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring the intensity of nursing care: making use of the Belgian Nursing Minimum Data Set.
Sermeus W; Delesie L; Van den Heede K; Diya L; Lesaffre E
Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Jul; 45(7):1011-21. PubMed ID: 17588580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gauging nursing intensity to bring costs to light.
Prescott PA; Phillips CY
Nurs Health Care; 1988 Jan; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 3336470
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation of the C.A.S.H. patient classification system for staff determination.
Des Ormeaux SP
Superv Nurse; 1977 Apr; 8(4):29-30, 33-5. PubMed ID: 245789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
