These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15603455)

  • 1. Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: broadband stimuli.
    Roberts RA; Lister JJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):965-78. PubMed ID: 15603455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: narrow-band stimuli.
    Lister JJ; Roberts RA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):482-93. PubMed ID: 15989406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of noise and reverberation on the precedence effect in listeners with normal hearing and impaired hearing.
    Roberts RA; Koehnke J; Besing J
    Am J Audiol; 2003 Dec; 12(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 14964325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical Correlates of Binaural Temporal Processing Deficits in Older Adults.
    Eddins AC; Eddins DA
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):594-604. PubMed ID: 29135686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: age effects.
    Lister JJ; Roberts RA; Lister FL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):367-74. PubMed ID: 21299377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relations among temporal acuity, hearing loss, and the perception of speech distorted by noise and reverberation.
    Irwin RJ; McAuley SF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 May; 81(5):1557-65. PubMed ID: 3584693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.
    Mao J; Koch KJ; Doherty KA; Carney LH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 16(4):507-21. PubMed ID: 25976088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of dichotic/diotic versus monotic presentation on speech understanding in noise in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kaplan H; Pickett JM
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 7297784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Hearing Aid Gain on Gap-Detection Thresholds for Children and Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Brennan MA; McCreery RW; Buss E; Jesteadt W
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):969-979. PubMed ID: 29489468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gap duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: effects of gap and marker duration, frequency separation, and mode of presentation.
    Grose JH; Hall JW; Buss E
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Dec; 2(4):388-98. PubMed ID: 11833611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners.
    Stuart A; Phillips DP
    Ear Hear; 1996 Dec; 17(6):478-89. PubMed ID: 8979036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of age on silent gap discrimination in synthetic speech stimuli.
    Lister J; Tarver K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):257-68. PubMed ID: 15157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory temporal resolution in adaptive tasks. Gap detection investigation.
    Alhaidary AA; Tanniru K; Aljadaan AF; Alabdulkarim LM
    Saudi Med J; 2019 Jan; 40(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 30617381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal Resolution of the Normal Ear in Listeners with Unilateral Hearing Impairment.
    Mishra SK; Dey R; Davessar JL
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 16(6):773-82. PubMed ID: 26197871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vowel perception by noise masked normal-hearing young adults.
    Richie C; Kewley-Port D; Coughlin M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1101-10. PubMed ID: 16158664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interference and enhancement effects on interaural time discrimination and level discrimination in listeners with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.
    Smith-Olinde L; Besing J; Koehnke J
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 15248807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.