These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15603471)

  • 1. The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1194-212. PubMed ID: 15603471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning new words: phonotactic probability in language development.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Dec; 44(6):1321-37. PubMed ID: 11776368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.
    Storkel HL; Hoover JR
    J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):105-19. PubMed ID: 20004908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differentiating the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on vocabulary comprehension and production: a comparison of preschool children with versus without phonological delays.
    Storkel HL; Maekawa J; Hoover JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 53(4):933-49. PubMed ID: 20543024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning.
    Storkel HL; Armbrüster J; Hogan TP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1175-92. PubMed ID: 17197489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning new words II: Phonotactic probability in verb learning.
    Storkel HL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Dec; 46(6):1312-23. PubMed ID: 14700357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of phonotactic probability/neighbourhood density on lexical learning in late talkers.
    MacRoy-Higgins M; Schwartz RG; Shafer VL; Marton K
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):188-99. PubMed ID: 23472958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developmental change is key to understanding primary language impairment: the case of phonotactic probability and nonword repetition.
    McKean C; Letts C; Howard D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1579-94. PubMed ID: 23926294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. I remembered the chorm! Word learning abilities of children with and without phonological impairment.
    Hearnshaw S; Baker E; Pomper R; McGregor KK; Edwards J; Munro N
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024; 59(3):913-931. PubMed ID: 37902394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The sensitivity of children with SLI to phonotactic probabilities during lexical access.
    Quémart P; Maillart C
    J Commun Disord; 2016; 61():48-59. PubMed ID: 27023739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Influence of Phonotactic Probability on Nonword Repetition and Fast Mapping in 3-Year-Olds With a History of Expressive Language Delay.
    MacRoy-Higgins M; Dalton KP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 58(6):1773-9. PubMed ID: 26540310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phonological and lexical effects in verbal recall by children with specific language impairments.
    Coady JA; Mainela-Arnold E; Evans JL
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(2):144-59. PubMed ID: 23472955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Adults' Word Learning in Noisy Conditions.
    Han MK; Storkel HL; Lee J; Cox C
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Nov; 25(4):547-560. PubMed ID: 27788276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of vocabulary size, phonotactic probability, and wordlikeness on nonword repetitions of children with and without specific language impairment.
    Munson B; Kurtz BA; Windsor J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1033-47. PubMed ID: 16411794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of homonymy on learning correctly articulated versus misarticulated words.
    Storkel HL; Maekawa J; Aschenbrenner AJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):694-707. PubMed ID: 23275395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition.
    Edwards J; Beckman ME; Munson B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):421-36. PubMed ID: 15157141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Triggering word learning in children with Language Impairment: the effect of phonotactic probability and neighbourhood density.
    McKean C; Letts C; Howard D
    J Child Lang; 2014 Nov; 41(6):1224-48. PubMed ID: 24191951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in the influence of phonological characteristics on expressive vocabulary development by young children.
    Maekawa J; Storkel HL
    J Child Lang; 2006 Aug; 33(3):439-59. PubMed ID: 17017275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of part-word phonotactic probability/neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children varying in expressive vocabulary.
    Storkel HL; Hoover JR
    J Child Lang; 2011 Jun; 38(3):628-43. PubMed ID: 20609282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Independent Effects of Phonotactic Probability and Neighborhood Density on Lexical Acquisition by Preschool Children.
    Storkel HL; Lee SY
    Lang Cogn Process; 2011; 26(2):191-211. PubMed ID: 21643455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.