These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15604563)

  • 1. Effect of population stratification on case-control association studies. II. False-positive rates and their limiting behavior as number of subpopulations increases.
    Gorroochurn P; Hodge SE; Heiman G; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15604563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of population stratification on case-control association studies. I. Elevation in false positive rates and comparison to confounding risk ratios (a simulation study).
    Heiman GA; Hodge SE; Gorroochurn P; Zhang J; Greenberg DA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 15604562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robustness of case-control studies of genetic factors to population stratification: magnitude of bias and type I error.
    Khlat M; Cazes MH; Génin E; Guiguet M
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Oct; 13(10):1660-4. PubMed ID: 15466984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simple formulas for gauging the potential impacts of population stratification bias.
    Lee WC; Wang LY
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 167(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 17881384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studying the joint effects of population stratification and sampling in case-control association studies.
    Cheng KF; Lee JY; Chen JH
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20357476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population stratification bias in the case-only study for gene-environment interactions.
    Wang LY; Lee WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 168(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 18497429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association mapping, using a mixture model for complex traits.
    Zhu X; Zhang S; Zhao H; Cooper RS
    Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Aug; 23(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 12214310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case-control association tests correcting for population stratification.
    Köhler K; Bickeböller H
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 Jan; 70(Pt 1):98-115. PubMed ID: 16441260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The bias introduced by population stratification in IBD based linkage analysis.
    Wang T; Elston RC
    Hum Hered; 2005; 60(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 16319490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for genetic association in the presence of population stratification in genome-wide association studies.
    Wang K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Nov; 33(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 19235185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating individual error rate into association test of unmatched case-control design.
    Hao K; Wang X
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):154-63. PubMed ID: 15812172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of bias in MoM values on patient risk and screening performance for Down syndrome.
    Nix B; Wright D; Baker A
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Sep; 27(9):840-5. PubMed ID: 17600858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing population stratification bias: stratum matching is better than exposure.
    Lee WC; Wang LY
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 18619810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On a semiparametric test to detect associations between quantitative traits and candidate genes using unrelated individuals.
    Zhang S; Zhu X; Zhao H
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 12508255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias correction with a single null marker for population stratification in candidate gene association studies.
    Wang Y; Localio R; Rebbeck TR
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(3):165-75. PubMed ID: 15920341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating bias due to population stratification in epidemiologic studies of gene-gene or gene-environment interactions.
    Wang Y; Localio R; Rebbeck TR
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Jan; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 16434597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attributing Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium to population stratification and genetic association in case-control studies.
    Grover VK; Cole DE; Hamilton DC
    Ann Hum Genet; 2010 Jan; 74(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 19930249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CAPL: a novel association test using case-control and family data and accounting for population stratification.
    Chung RH; Schmidt MA; Morris RW; Martin ER
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 34(7):747-55. PubMed ID: 20878716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of bias in direct effects estimates due to different types of measurement error in the mediator.
    le Cessie S; Debeij J; Rosendaal FR; Cannegieter SC; Vandenbroucke JP
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jul; 23(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 22526092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Misclassification in case-control studies of gene-environment interactions: assessment of bias and sample size.
    Garcia-Closas M; Rothman N; Lubin J
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Dec; 8(12):1043-50. PubMed ID: 10613335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.