BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15604564)

  • 1. Using overall allele-sharing to detect the presence of large-scale data errors and parameter misspecification in sib-pair linkage studies.
    Olson JM; Song Y; Lu Q; Wedig GC; Goddard KA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15604564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
    Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
    Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The power of two-locus affected sib-pair linkage analysis to detect interacting disease loci.
    Hallgrímsdóttir IB; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17654608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnosis as a covariate in sib-pair linkage analysis.
    Rice JP
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Jan; 105(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 11424999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci: common tests vs. the asymptotically most powerful test.
    Schaid DJ; Nick TG
    Genet Epidemiol; 1990; 7(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 2253870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power of non-parametric linkage analysis in mapping genes contributing to human longevity in long-lived sib-pairs.
    Tan Q; Zhao JH; Iachine I; Hjelmborg J; Vach W; Vaupel JW; Christensen K; Kruse TA
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 26(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 15022210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonparametric trend statistic incorporating dispersion differences in sib pair linkage for quantitative traits.
    Kim MK; Hong YJ; Song HH
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16954696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Allele-sharing statistics using information on family history.
    Callegaro A; Meulenbelt I; Kloppenburg M; Slagboom PE; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2010 Nov; 74(6):547-54. PubMed ID: 20707788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using affected sib-pairs to uncover rare disease variants.
    Perdry H; Müller-Myhsok B; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Hum Hered; 2012; 74(3-4):129-41. PubMed ID: 23594491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A meta-analysis of chromosome 18 linkage data for bipolar illness.
    Dorr DA; Rice JP; Armstrong C; Reich T; Blehar M
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 9433552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing association and linkage using affected-sib-parent study designs.
    Millstein J; Siegmund KD; Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Nov; 29(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 16121357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exact transmission-disequilibrium tests with multiallelic markers.
    Cleves MA; Olson JM; Jacobs KB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 9271708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases.
    Göring HH; Ott J
    Eur J Hum Genet; 1997; 5(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 9195155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The method of sib-pair linkage analysis in context of case-control design.
    Yang Q; Atkinson M; Sun F; Sherman S; Khoury MJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):939-44. PubMed ID: 9433604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parametric model-based statistics for possible genotyping errors and sample stratification in sibling-pair SNP data.
    Korostishevsky M; Malkin I; Spector T; Livshits G
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 34(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 19455577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Model-free sib-pair linkage analysis: combining full-sib and half-sib pairs.
    Schaid DJ; Elston RC; Tran L; Wilson AF
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):30-51. PubMed ID: 10861895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.