413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15605191)
1. Comparison between the Klemetti index and heel DXA BMD measurements in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density in the elderly.
Halling A; Persson GR; Berglund J; Johansson O; Renvert S
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):999-1003. PubMed ID: 15605191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of calcaneus bone densitometry against hip and spine for diagnosis of osteoporosis.
Williams ED; Daymond TJ
Br J Radiol; 2003 Feb; 76(902):123-8. PubMed ID: 12642281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Singh Index does not correlate with bone mineral density (BMD) measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT).
Klatte TO; Vettorazzi E; Beckmann J; Pueschel K; Amling M; Gebauer M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 May; 135(5):645-50. PubMed ID: 25739991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular cortical shape index in non-standardised panoramic radiographs for identifying patients with osteoporosis as defined by the German Osteology Organization.
Al-Dam A; Blake F; Atac A; Amling M; Blessmann M; Assaf A; Hanken H; Smeets R; Heiland M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):e165-9. PubMed ID: 23357130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Panoramic-based mandibular indices in relation to mandibular bone mineral density and skeletal status assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound.
Drozdzowska B; Pluskiewicz W; Tarnawska B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12424634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee LJ; del Rio AM; Lauder T; Bruce RJ; Summers RM; Pooler BD; Binkley N
J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Sep; 26(9):2194-203. PubMed ID: 21590738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurements in Mandibular Pantomographic X-rays and Relation to Skeletal Mineral Densitometric Values.
Singh SV; Aggarwal H; Gupta V; Kumar P; Tripathi A
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):255-61. PubMed ID: 25934028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular radiomorphometric indices in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density.
Devlin H; Horner K
Osteoporos Int; 2002 May; 13(5):373-8. PubMed ID: 12086347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of heel ultrasound bone density in men.
Adler RA; Funkhouser HL; Holt CM
J Clin Densitom; 2001; 4(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 11740064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of accuracy and cost effectiveness of clinical criteria and BUA for referral for BMD assessment by DXA in osteoporotic and osteopenic perimenopausal subjects.
Langton CM; Langton DK; Beardsworth SA
Technol Health Care; 1999; 7(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 10543417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of low bone mass in CKD-5D patients.
Blomquist GA; Davenport DL; Mawad HW; Monier-Faugere MC; Malluche HH
Clin Nephrol; 2016 Feb; 85(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 26587778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpretation of calcaneus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in the assessment of osteopenia and fracture risk.
Wren TA; Yerby SA; Beaupré GS; Carter DR
J Bone Miner Res; 2000 Aug; 15(8):1573-8. PubMed ID: 10934656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Panoramic measures for oral bone mass in detecting osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Calciolari E; Donos N; Park JC; Petrie A; Mardas N
J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3 Suppl):17S-27S. PubMed ID: 25365969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: selection by body composition.
Michaëlsson K; Bergström R; Mallmin H; Holmberg L; Wolk A; Ljunghall S
Osteoporos Int; 1996; 6(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 8704349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men.
Gonnelli S; Cepollaro C; Gennari L; Montagnani A; Caffarelli C; Merlotti D; Rossi S; Cadirni A; Nuti R
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 15599495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for osteoporosis using easily obtainable biometrical data: diagnostic accuracy of measured, self-reported and recalled BMI, and related costs of bone mineral density measurements.
van der Voort DJ; Brandon S; Dinant GJ; van Wersch JW
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 10824239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between BMD, dental panoramic radiographic findings and biochemical markers of bone turnover in diagnosis of osteoporosis.
Vlasiadis KZ; Damilakis J; Velegrakis GA; Skouteris CA; Fragouli I; Goumenou A; Matalliotakis J; Koumantakis EE
Maturitas; 2008 Mar; 59(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 18342460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture risk among older men: osteopenia and osteoporosis defined using cut-points derived from female versus male reference data.
Pasco JA; Lane SE; Brennan SL; Timney EN; Bucki-Smith G; Dobbins AG; Nicholson GC; Kotowicz MA
Osteoporos Int; 2014 Mar; 25(3):857-62. PubMed ID: 24196721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
