542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15605430)
1. High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis?
Santos MA; Munhoz MS; Peixoto MA; Silva CS
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15605430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of stimulus repetition rate on the auditory brain stem responses (ABR).
Paludetti G; Maurizi M; Ottaviani F
Am J Otol; 1983 Jan; 4(3):226-34. PubMed ID: 6829737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Auditory brainstem responses in patients under treatment of hemodialysis.
Aspris AK; Thodi CD; Balatsouras DG; Thodis ED; Vargemezis V; Danielides V
Ren Fail; 2008; 30(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 18569911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis--use of 2 stimulation frequencies].
Plasová V; Urban P
Cesk Neurol Neurochir; 1990 Nov; 53(6):386-95. PubMed ID: 2261649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neurogenic vestibular evoked potentials using a tone pip auditory stimulus.
Papathanasiou ES; Zamba-Papanicolaou E; Pantziaris M; Kleopas K; Kyriakides T; Papacostas S; Pattichis C; Iliopoulos I; Piperidou C
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004; 44(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 15125057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evoked potentials of the brain stem in normal and pathologic conditions: experience with 692 adult subjects].
Burdo S
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1989; 9 Suppl 24():1-36. PubMed ID: 2686347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of unilateral versus bilateral clicks on the vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.
Huang TW; Cheng PW; Su HC
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 16436989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acoustic reflex dynamics and auditory brain stem responses in multiple sclerosis.
Keith RW; Garza-Holquin Y; Smolak L; Pensak ML
Am J Otol; 1987 Sep; 8(5):406-13. PubMed ID: 3688198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Auditory evoked potentials from medulla and midbrain in the clawed frog, Xenopus laevis laevis.
Bibikov NG; Elepfandt A
Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):29-36. PubMed ID: 15925189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brain-stem auditory impairment during the neonatal period in term infants after asphyxia: dynamic changes in brain-stem auditory evoked response to clicks of different rates.
Jiang ZD; Yin R; Shao XM; Wilkinson AR
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1605-15. PubMed ID: 15203061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The combined effects of forward masking by noise and high click rate on monaural and binaural human auditory nerve and brainstem potentials.
Pratt H; Polyakov A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):83-94. PubMed ID: 15219323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.
Cebulla M; Lurz H; Shehata-Dieler W
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural correlates of the precedence effect in auditory evoked potentials.
Damaschke J; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):157-71. PubMed ID: 15953525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: early latency components.
Sims MH; Moore RE
Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2019-27. PubMed ID: 6497099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory evoked potentials in the detection of interaural intensity differences in children and adults.
Wambacq IJ; Koehnke J; Shea-Miller KJ; Besing J; Toth V; Abubakr A
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 17485981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The influence of click polarity and stimulation rate on the auditory evoked response in relation to age].
Tarantino V; Stura M; Raspino M; Conrad E; Porcu A
Pediatr Med Chir; 1989; 11(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 2631058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The diagnostic value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography, multimodal evoked potentials and cerebrospinal fluid examination in multiple sclerosis].
Staffen W; Trinka E; Ladurner G
Nervenarzt; 1993 Apr; 64(4):226-32. PubMed ID: 8506010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
Mills DM
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Binaural voltage summation of brainstem auditory evoked potentials: an adjunct to the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis.
Prasher DK; Sainz M; Gibson WP
Ann Neurol; 1982 Jan; 11(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 6277237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Click evoked neurogenic vestibular potentials (NVESTEPs): a method of assessing the function of the vestibular system.
Papathanasiou E; Zamba-Papanicolaou E; Pantziaris M; Kyriakides T; Papacostas S; Myrianthopoulou P; Pattichis C; Iliopoulos I; Piperidou C
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 43(7):399-408. PubMed ID: 14626719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
