202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15605865)
1. Identification of the impedance model of an implanted cochlear prosthesis from intracochlear potential measurements.
Vanpoucke FJ; Zarowski AJ; Peeters SA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Dec; 51(12):2174-83. PubMed ID: 15605865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation.
Suesserman MF; Spelman FA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 40(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 8335327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tissue resistivities determine the current flow in the cochlea.
Micco AG; Richter CP
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 16974151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 15953524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrical impedance measurements of cochlear structures using the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique.
Kumar G; Chokshi M; Richter CP
Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):86-94. PubMed ID: 19857561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrical resistivity measurements in the mammalian cochlea after neural degeneration.
Micco AG; Richter CP
Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1334-41. PubMed ID: 16885732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stimulation of the facial nerve by intracochlear electrodes in otosclerosis: a computer modeling study.
Frijns JH; Kalkman RK; Briaire JJ
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 19574948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of the resistive properties of bone on neural excitation and electric fields in cochlear implant models.
Malherbe TK; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():126-35. PubMed ID: 26074305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Excitation patterns of simultaneous and sequential dual-electrode stimulation in cochlear implant recipients.
Saoji AA; Litvak LM; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 19617837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of electrical current configuration on potential fields in the electrically stimulated cochlea: field models and measurements.
Spelman FA; Pfingst BE; Clopton BM; Jolly CN; Rodenhiser KL
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():131-6. PubMed ID: 7668604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital X-ray stereophotogrammetry for cochlear implantation.
Wang G; Skinner MW; Rubinstein JT; Howard MA; Vannier MW
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Aug; 47(8):1120-30. PubMed ID: 10943062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intracochlear misdirected implantation of a cochlear implant.
Tange RA; Grolman W; Maat A
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):650-2. PubMed ID: 16720451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes of postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients: the short-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids.
Paasche G; Bockel F; Tasche C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 16868511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Representation of acoustic signals in the human cochlea in presence of a cochlear implant electrode.
Kiefer J; Böhnke F; Adunka O; Arnold W
Hear Res; 2006 Nov; 221(1-2):36-43. PubMed ID: 16962268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of intra-cochlear electrodes and tissue interface by electrochemical impedance methods in vivo.
Duan YY; Clark GM; Cowan RS
Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(17):3813-28. PubMed ID: 15020157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.
Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 214(1-2):17-27. PubMed ID: 16520009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrical properties of retinal-electrode interface.
Shah S; Hines A; Zhou D; Greenberg RJ; Humayun MS; Weiland JD
J Neural Eng; 2007 Mar; 4(1):S24-9. PubMed ID: 17325413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC
Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of stimulus attenuation in cochlear implants.
Smit JE; Hanekom T; Hanekom JJ
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Jun; 180(2):363-73. PubMed ID: 19464523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
