202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15605865)
21. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
Henkin Y; Kaplan-Neeman R; Kronenberg J; Migirov L; Hildesheimer M; Muchnik C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An introduction to the biophysics of the electrically evoked compound action potential.
Rubinstein JT
Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 15732375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An in vitro model for investigating impedance changes with cell growth and electrical stimulation: implications for cochlear implants.
Newbold C; Richardson R; Huang CQ; Milojevic D; Cowan R; Shepherd R
J Neural Eng; 2004 Dec; 1(4):218-27. PubMed ID: 15876642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
Dingemanse JG; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intracochlear potential distribution with intracochlear and extracochlear electrical stimulation in humans.
Kasper A; Pelizzone M; Montandon P
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1991 Oct; 100(10):812-6. PubMed ID: 1952647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents.
Kral A; Hartmann R; Mortazavi D; Klinke R
Hear Res; 1998 Jul; 121(1-2):11-28. PubMed ID: 9682804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients.
Paasche G; Tasche C; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug; 30(5):592-8. PubMed ID: 19546829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Electrode-tissues interface: modeling and experimental validation.
Sawan M; Laaziri Y; Mounaim F; Elzayat E; Corcos J; Elhilali MM
Biomed Mater; 2007 Mar; 2(1):S7-S15. PubMed ID: 18458423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Simulation of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve.
Rattay F
Artif Organs; 1997 Mar; 21(3):213-5. PubMed ID: 9148708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy.
Papsin BC
Laryngoscope; 2005 Jan; 115(1 Pt 2 Suppl 106):1-26. PubMed ID: 15626926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessing the placement of a cochlear electrode array by multidimensional scaling.
Vanpoucke FJ; Boermans PP; Frijns JH
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Feb; 59(2):307-10. PubMed ID: 22042122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels.
van den Honert C; Kelsall DC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3703-16. PubMed ID: 17552721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear-implanted children.
Thai-Van H; Cozma S; Boutitie F; Disant F; Truy E; Collet L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):676-89. PubMed ID: 17223382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The facial nerve canal: an important cochlear conduction path revealed by Clarion electrical field imaging.
Vanpoucke F; Zarowski A; Casselman J; Frijns J; Peeters S
Otol Neurotol; 2004 May; 25(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 15129106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
