BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15606460)

  • 1. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
    Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
    Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera.
    Deb-Joardar N; Germain N; Thuret G; Manoli P; Garcin AF; Millot L; Gavet Y; Estour B; Gain P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 140(5):814-821. PubMed ID: 16310458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Targeted mydriasis strategies for diabetic retinopathy screening clinics.
    Dervan EW; O'Brien PD; Hobbs H; Acheson R; Flitcroft DI
    Eye (Lond); 2010 Jul; 24(7):1207-12. PubMed ID: 20139914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
    Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of the polaroid and digital non-mydriatic cameras in the detection of referrable diabetic retinopathy in Australia.
    Phiri R; Keeffe JE; Harper CA; Taylor HR
    Diabet Med; 2006 Aug; 23(8):867-72. PubMed ID: 16911624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy.
    Bursell SE; Cavallerano JD; Cavallerano AA; Clermont AC; Birkmire-Peters D; Aiello LP; Aiello LM;
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Mar; 108(3):572-85. PubMed ID: 11237913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
    Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
    Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
    Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
    Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera.
    Maberley D; Morris A; Hay D; Chang A; Hall L; Mandava N
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
    Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
    Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
    Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
    Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
    Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
    Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Joslin Vision Network Validation Study: pilot image stabilization phase.
    Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Cavallerano J; Gardner WK; Strong J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1998 Nov; 69(11):699-710. PubMed ID: 9844322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Esquivel A; Florez-Arango JF; Krupinski EA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):3184-92. PubMed ID: 20053978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.