641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15606461)
1. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera.
Deb-Joardar N; Germain N; Thuret G; Manoli P; Garcin AF; Millot L; Gavet Y; Estour B; Gain P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 140(5):814-821. PubMed ID: 16310458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Joslin Vision Network Validation Study: pilot image stabilization phase.
Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Cavallerano J; Gardner WK; Strong J
J Am Optom Assoc; 1998 Nov; 69(11):699-710. PubMed ID: 9844322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Maberley D; Morris A; Hay D; Chang A; Hall L; Mandava N
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity and specificity of automated analysis of single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs by Bosch DR Algorithm-Comparison with mydriatic fundus photography (ETDRS) for screening in undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy.
Bawankar P; Shanbhag N; K SS; Dhawan B; Palsule A; Kumar D; Chandel S; Sood S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189854. PubMed ID: 29281690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.
Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of automated screening for treatment-requiring diabetic retinopathy.
Larsen M; Gondolf T; Godt J; Jensen MS; Hartvig NV; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen N
Curr Eye Res; 2007 Apr; 32(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 17453954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of automated fundus photograph analysis algorithms for detecting microaneurysms, haemorrhages and exudates, and of a computer-assisted diagnostic system for grading diabetic retinopathy.
Dupas B; Walter T; Erginay A; Ordonez R; Deb-Joardar N; Gain P; Klein JC; Massin P
Diabetes Metab; 2010 Jun; 36(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 20219404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Targeted mydriasis strategies for diabetic retinopathy screening clinics.
Dervan EW; O'Brien PD; Hobbs H; Acheson R; Flitcroft DI
Eye (Lond); 2010 Jul; 24(7):1207-12. PubMed ID: 20139914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy?
Murgatroyd H; Cox A; Ellingford A; Ellis JD; Macewen CJ; Leese GP
Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 17024219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
