These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15607018)

  • 1. The use of linear mixed models to estimate variance components from data on twin pairs by maximum likelihood.
    Visscher PM; Benyamin B; White I
    Twin Res; 2004 Dec; 7(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 15607018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Approximate solutions for the maximum-likelihood estimates in models of univariate human twin data.
    Wijesiri UW; Williams CJ
    Behav Genet; 1995 May; 25(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 7598664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mixed-effects variance components models for biometric family analyses.
    McArdle JJ; Prescott CA
    Behav Genet; 2005 Sep; 35(5):631-52. PubMed ID: 16184490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of analysis of variance and maximum likelihood based path analysis of twin data: partitioning genetic and environmental sources of covariance.
    Christian JC; Norton JA; Sorbel J; Williams CJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 7713398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis.
    Chen G; Saad ZS; Britton JC; Pine DS; Cox RW
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jun; 73():176-90. PubMed ID: 23376789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The intraclass covariance matrix.
    Carey G
    Behav Genet; 2005 Sep; 35(5):667-70. PubMed ID: 16184492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power of the classical twin design revisited.
    Visscher PM
    Twin Res; 2004 Oct; 7(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 15527666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Precision and bias of a normal finite mixture distribution model to analyze twin data when zygosity is unknown: simulations and application to IQ phenotypes on a large sample of twin pairs.
    Benyamin B; Deary IJ; Visscher PM
    Behav Genet; 2006 Nov; 36(6):935-46. PubMed ID: 16786426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of censoring on parameter estimates and power in genetic modeling.
    Derks EM; Dolan CV; Boomsma DI
    Twin Res; 2004 Dec; 7(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 15607017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semiparametric maximum likelihood variance component estimation using mixture moment structure models.
    Markon KE
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Jun; 9(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 16790146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Statistical methods for the analysis of twin data].
    Fagnani C; Brescianini S; Medda E; Stazi MA
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2006; 42(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 16801730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of genetic and environmental factors for binary traits using family data.
    Pawitan Y; Reilly M; Nilsson E; Cnattingius S; Lichtenstein P
    Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):449-65. PubMed ID: 14748038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Likelihood-based concordance tests for analysis of ascertained twin pair multinomial data.
    Huang JK; Liu AY; Tai JJ
    Stat Med; 2012 Jan; 31(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 22052434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytic approaches to twin data using structural equation models.
    Rijsdijk FV; Sham PC
    Brief Bioinform; 2002 Jun; 3(2):119-33. PubMed ID: 12139432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the covariance between parameter estimates in models of twin data.
    Williams CJ
    Biometrics; 1993 Jun; 49(2):557-68. PubMed ID: 8369388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biometrical modeling of twin and family data using standard mixed model software.
    Rabe-Hesketh S; Skrondal A; Gjessing HK
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):280-8. PubMed ID: 17484777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic mixed linear models for twin survival data.
    Ha ID; Lee Y; Pawitan Y
    Behav Genet; 2007 Jul; 37(4):621-30. PubMed ID: 17401640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrete distributions for use in twin studies.
    Yu C; Waller LA; Zelterman D
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):546-57. PubMed ID: 9629643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DF-analyses of heritability with double-entry twin data: asymptotic standard errors and efficient estimation.
    Kohler HP; Rodgers JL
    Behav Genet; 2001 Mar; 31(2):179-91. PubMed ID: 11545535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variance components analysis for pedigree-based censored survival data using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) and Gibbs sampling in BUGS.
    Scurrah KJ; Palmer LJ; Burton PR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Sep; 19(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 10962474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.