233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15607857)
1. Visualization of femorotibial contact in total knee arthroplasty using X-ray fluoroscopy.
Yamazaki T; Watanabe T; Nakajima Y; Sugamoto K; Tomita T; Maeda D; Sahara W; Yoshikawa H; Tamura S
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Jan; 53(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 15607857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo kinematic analysis of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized, mobile-bearing knee prosthesis in deep knee bending motion.
Tamaki M; Tomita T; Watanabe T; Yamazaki T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):972-8. PubMed ID: 19033084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.
Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Mahfouz MR; Haas BD; Stiehl JB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):37-57. PubMed ID: 14646738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limited rotation of the mobile-bearing in a rotating platform total knee prosthesis.
Garling EH; Kaptein BL; Nelissen RG; Valstar ER
J Biomech; 2007; 40 Suppl 1():S25-30. PubMed ID: 17433337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo kinematic analysis of a high-flexion posterior stabilized fixed-bearing knee prosthesis in deep knee-bending motion.
Tamaki M; Tomita T; Yamazaki T; Hozack WJ; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Sep; 23(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 18555651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The kinematics of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
Most E; Li G; Schule S; Sultan P; Park SE; Zayontz S; Rubash HE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):197-207. PubMed ID: 14646762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of post-cam design of posterior stabilized knee prosthesis on tibiofemoral motion during high knee flexion.
Lin KJ; Huang CH; Liu YL; Chen WC; Chang TW; Yang CT; Lai YS; Cheng CK
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Oct; 26(8):847-52. PubMed ID: 21546143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BoneMorphing versus freehand localization of anatomical landmarks: consequences for the reproducibility of implant positioning in total knee arthroplasty.
Perrin N; Stindel E; Roux C
Comput Aided Surg; 2005; 10(5-6):301-9. PubMed ID: 16410232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D kinematics of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty using X-ray fluoroscopy.
Yamazaki T; Futai K; Tomita T; Sato Y; Yoshikawa H; Tamura S; Sugamoto K
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Apr; 10(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 24965187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new in vivo technique for determination of femoro-tibial and femoro-patellar 3D kinematics in total knee arthroplasty.
von Eisenhart-Rothe R; Vogl T; Englmeier KH; Graichen H
J Biomech; 2007; 40(14):3079-88. PubMed ID: 17475270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo kinematics of mobile-bearing knee arthroplasty in deep knee bending motion.
Watanabe T; Yamazaki T; Sugamoto K; Tomita T; Hashimoto H; Maeda D; Tamura S; Ochi T; Yoshikawa H
J Orthop Res; 2004 Sep; 22(5):1044-9. PubMed ID: 15304277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements.
Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Mahfouz MR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):114-30. PubMed ID: 12771822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty.
Argenson JN; Scuderi GR; Komistek RD; Scott WN; Kelly MA; Aubaniac JM
J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 15598454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting the impingement angle of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements: a laboratory study.
Walker PS; Yildirim G; Sussman-Fort J; Roth J; White B; Klein GR
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Aug; 22(5):745-52. PubMed ID: 17689786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro.
Nicholls RL; Schirm AC; Jeffcote BO; Kuster MS
J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1506-12. PubMed ID: 17568418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anterior tibial post impingement in a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
Li G; Papannagari R; Most E; Park SE; Johnson T; Tanamal L; Rubash HE
J Orthop Res; 2005 May; 23(3):536-41. PubMed ID: 15885472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo contact pressures in total knee arthroplasty.
Sharma A; Komistek RD; Ranawat CS; Dennis DA; Mahfouz MR
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):404-16. PubMed ID: 17400097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress analysis of the anterior tibial post in posterior stabilized knee prostheses.
Huang CH; Liau JJ; Huang CH; Cheng CK
J Orthop Res; 2007 Apr; 25(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 17205566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of tibial stem design on component micromotion in knee arthroplasty.
Stern SH; Wills RD; Gilbert JL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):44-52. PubMed ID: 9418620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How effective are added constraints in improving TKR kinematics?
van Duren BH; Pandit H; Beard DJ; Zavatsky AB; Gallagher JA; Thomas NP; Shakespeare DT; Murray DW; Gill HS
J Biomech; 2007; 40 Suppl 1():S31-7. PubMed ID: 17433336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
