171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15607869)
1. Mechanical characteristics of the bone-graft-cement interface after impaction allografting.
Frei H; Mitchell P; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
J Orthop Res; 2005 Jan; 23(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15607869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biological and mechanical changes of the bone graft-cement interface after impaction allografting.
Frei H; O'Connell J; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
J Orthop Res; 2005 Nov; 23(6):1271-9. PubMed ID: 15964167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structural characteristics of impaction allografting for revision total hip arthroplasty.
Robinson MC; Fernlund G; Dominic Meek RM; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):853-5. PubMed ID: 16023774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mixed-mode failure response of the cement-bone interface.
Mann KA; Mocarski R; Damron LA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
J Orthop Res; 2001 Nov; 19(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 11781018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty.
Dohmae Y; Bechtold JE; Sherman RE; Puno RM; Gustilo RB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Nov; (236):214-20. PubMed ID: 3180573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Allograft impaction and cement penetration after revision hip replacement. A histomorphometric analysis in the cadaver femur.
Frei H; Mitchell P; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2004 Jul; 86(5):771-6. PubMed ID: 15274278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-yield and post-yield shear behavior of the cement-bone interface.
Mann KA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
J Orthop Res; 1998 May; 16(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 9671933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A hydroxyapatite graft substitute reduces subsidence in a femoral impaction grafting model.
Munro NA; Downing MR; Meakin JR; Lee AJ; Ashcroft GP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Feb; 455():246-52. PubMed ID: 16967033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histological and biomechanical study of impacted cancellous allografts with cement in the femur: a canine model.
Omoto O; Yasunaga Y; Adachi N; Deie M; Ochi M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1357-64. PubMed ID: 18758792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cement flow during impaction allografting: a finite element analysis.
Frei H; Gadala MS; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
J Biomech; 2006; 39(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 16389089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impaction bone grafting with hydroxyapatite: increased femoral component stability in experiments using Sawbones.
Fujishiro T; Nishikawa T; Niikura T; Takikawa S; Nishiyama T; Mizuno K; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
Acta Orthop; 2005 Aug; 76(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 16195073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effect of shock waves on the strength of connection between bone and polymethylmethacrylate. An in vitro study of human femur segments].
Braun W; Claes L; Rüter A; Paschke D
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1992; 130(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 1642041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cement penetration and primary stability of the femoral component after impaction allografting. A biomechanical study in the cadaveric femur.
Albert C; Patil S; Frei H; Masri B; Duncan C; Oxland T; Fernlund G
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jul; 89(7):962-70. PubMed ID: 17673596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metal/cement interface strength in cemented stem fixation.
Ahmed AM; Raab S; Miller JE
J Orthop Res; 1984; 2(2):105-18. PubMed ID: 6491806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strength of the cement-bone interface.
Krause WR; Krug W; Miller J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Mar; (163):290-9. PubMed ID: 7067264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The microscopic anatomy of the bone-cement interface in failed total hip arthroplasties.
Johanson NA; Bullough PG; Wilson PD; Salvati EA; Ranawat CS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 May; (218):123-35. PubMed ID: 3568472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Penetration and shear strength of cement-bone interfaces in vivo.
MacDonald W; Swarts E; Beaver R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jan; (286):283-8. PubMed ID: 8425359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is it advantageous to strengthen the cement-metal interface and use a collar for cemented femoral components of total hip replacements?
Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):67-72. PubMed ID: 1446456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
