835 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15608107)
1. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
Engoren M; Barbee D
Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
Corley A; Barnett AG; Mullany D; Fraser JF
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Equivalence of the bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in measuring cardiac output in hospitalized patients with advanced, decompensated chronic heart failure.
Albert NM; Hail MD; Li J; Young JB
Am J Crit Care; 2004 Nov; 13(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 15568652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of 2 modified Fick methods and thermodilution for determining the cardiac output in patients with mechanical ventilation].
Corbanese U; Possamai C
Minerva Anestesiol; 1995 May; 61(5):191-9. PubMed ID: 7478050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery.
Breukers RM; Sepehrkhouy S; Spiegelenberg SR; Groeneveld AB
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):632-5. PubMed ID: 17905265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation.
Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Bishop MH; Appel PL; Van de Water JM; Harrington GR; Wang X; Patil RS
Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1907-12. PubMed ID: 7988125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cardiac output--pulse contour analysis vs. pulmonary artery thermodilution.
Ostergaard M; Nielsen J; Rasmussen JP; Berthelsen PG
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2006 Oct; 50(9):1044-9. PubMed ID: 16987334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new semi-continuous cardiac output system in the intensive care unit.
Seguin P; Colcanap O; Le Rouzo A; Tanguy M; Guillou YM; Mallédant Y
Can J Anaesth; 1998 Jun; 45(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 9669016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility and comparison of cardiac output measurement by transthoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in critically ill patients.
Ng HW; Coleman N; Walley TJ; Mostafa SM; Breckenridge AM
Clin Intensive Care; 1993; 4(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 10146700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Precision of bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Ostergaard M; Nilsson LB; Nilsson JC; Rasmussen JP; Berthelsen PG
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Mar; 49(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 15752403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of thermodilution and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac outputs.
Woo MA; Hamilton M; Stevenson LW; Vredevoe DL
Heart Lung; 1991 Jul; 20(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 2071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of cardiac output by transpulmonary arterial thermodilution using a long radial artery catheter. A comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution.
Orme RM; Pigott DW; Mihm FG
Anaesthesia; 2004 Jun; 59(6):590-4. PubMed ID: 15144300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].
Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Fick and thermodilution cardiac output determinations in standing horses.
Lépiz ML; Keegan RD; Bayly WM; Greene SA; McEwen MM
Res Vet Sci; 2008 Oct; 85(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 18093624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac output determination in children: equivalence of the transpulmonary thermodilution method to the direct Fick principle.
Pauli C; Fakler U; Genz T; Hennig M; Lorenz HP; Hess J
Intensive Care Med; 2002 Jul; 28(7):947-52. PubMed ID: 12122535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of electrical velocimetry and transthoracic thermodilution technique for cardiac output assessment in critically ill patients.
Raue W; Swierzy M; Koplin G; Schwenk W
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Dec; 26(12):1067-71. PubMed ID: 19412107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and fick cardiac output in critically ill patients.
Dhingra VK; Fenwick JC; Walley KR; Chittock DR; Ronco JJ
Chest; 2002 Sep; 122(3):990-7. PubMed ID: 12226045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Arterial pulse cardiac output agreement with thermodilution in patients in hyperdynamic conditions.
Della Rocca G; Costa MG; Chiarandini P; Bertossi G; Lugano M; Pompei L; Coccia C; Sainz-Barriga M; Pietropaoli P
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2008 Oct; 22(5):681-7. PubMed ID: 18922423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A
Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
