108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1560922)
21. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women.
Suarez L; Pulley L
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):41-7. PubMed ID: 8562221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of the efficiency of diagnosis of early cervical carcinoma by general practitioners and cytology screening programs in the Netherlands.
Kirk RS; Boon ME
Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 6942616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Women's attitudes to and awareness of smear testing and cervical cancer.
Yu CK; Rymer J
Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Jan; 23(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 9882766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [HPV vaccine and cervical cancer prevention in general practice. Survey conducted among general practitioners in the French departments of Eure-et-Loir and Cher].
Pélissier G; Bastides F
Rev Prat; 2008 Dec; 58(19 Suppl):25-31. PubMed ID: 19253788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.
Chew-Graham C; Mole E; Evans LJ; Rogers A
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jun; 61(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 15964735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Screening for colorectal cancer: a survey of New Zealand general practitioners.
Berry S; Arroll B; Fraser A; Weller D
N Z Med J; 1996 Nov; 109(1034):447-9. PubMed ID: 8982177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical cancer screening: women's knowledge, attitudes and preferences.
Nicoll PM; Narayan KV; Paterson JG
Health Bull (Edinb); 1991 May; 49(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 1917453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening for cervical cancer among female physicians and their relatives in Taiwan: a population-based comparative study.
Chen LS; Huang N; Tsay JH; Wang PJ; Chou YJ; Chou P; Lee CH
Prev Med; 2007 Jun; 44(6):531-5. PubMed ID: 17467786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cervical cancer screening practices among general practitioners in Lagos Nigeria.
Anorlu RI; Ribiu KA; Abudu OO; Ola ER
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 27(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 17454471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improving cervical cancer screening in hospital settings.
Klassen A; Hall A; Bowie J; Weisman CS
Prev Med; 2000 Nov; 31(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 11071834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Obstacles and reticences in the screening of cancer of the cervix by the general practitioner].
Weil O; Schaffer P
Bull Cancer; 1994 Apr; 81(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 7703550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Can breast and cervical cancer screening visits be used to enhance colorectal cancer screening?
Carlos RC; Fendrick AM; Ellis J; Bernstein SJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):769-76. PubMed ID: 17411698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Buehler SK; Parsons WL
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differences in predictors of cervical and breast cancer screening by screening need in uninsured Latino women.
Buki LP; Jamison J; Anderson CJ; Cuadra AM
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 110(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 17696119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Screening for cervical cancer: will women accept less?
Sirovich BE; Woloshin S; Schwartz LM
Am J Med; 2005 Feb; 118(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 15694900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programme in the Harare City Health Department, Zimbabwe.
Moyo IM; Koni NP; Makunike B; Hipshman J; Makaure HK; Gumbo N
Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Aug; 43(8):223-5. PubMed ID: 9431759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Screening for cervical cancer by general practitioners in Ghent, Belgium.
De Schryver A; Derese A; Geldhof A; Vuylsteek K
Cancer Detect Prev; 1989; 13(5-6):343-8. PubMed ID: 2743357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
Voordijk-van der Ben MH; Buntinx F
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 10674106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Health screening in a general practice by opportunistic recruitment.
McMenamin JP
N Z Med J; 1992 Dec; 105(947):495-7. PubMed ID: 1461608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
