297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15609584)
1. [Speech tests: application in individuals with noise induced hearing loss].
Moreira RR; Ferreira Junior M
Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15609584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the limited transfer of information with noise-induced hearing loss.
Smoorenburg GF
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():38-46. PubMed ID: 2356737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Utility and limitations of speech audiometry testing in the detection of occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting].
Babin E; Bequignon A; Goullet de Rugy M; Edy E; Moreau S; Izard JP; Valdazo A
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 12723484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: differences and similarities in binaural performance.
Köbler S; Lindblad AC; Olofsson A; Hagerman B
Int J Audiol; 2010 Sep; 49(9):613-27. PubMed ID: 20707668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech recognition abilities in noise for children with severe-to-profound unilateral hearing impairment.
Ruscetta MN; Arjmand EM; Pratt SR
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 69(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 15885329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
Zeng FG; Liu S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation.
Leensen MC; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):455-65. PubMed ID: 23772828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influence of disturbing noise on sentence intelligibility (author's transl)].
Welzl-Müller K
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Mar; 60(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 7230993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Informativeness of critical ratios "useful signal-masking noise" in speech communication.
Tzaneva L
Cent Eur J Public Health; 1998 Nov; 6(4):293-5. PubMed ID: 9919381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impaired word recognition in noise by patients with noise-induced cochlear hearing loss: contribution of temporal resolution defect.
Phillips DP; Rappaport JM; Gulliver JM
Am J Otol; 1994 Sep; 15(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 8572072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency selectivity and speech intelligibility in noise.
Lyregaard PE
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():113-22. PubMed ID: 6955919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
Cameron S; Dillon H
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test.
Soli SD; Wong LL
Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):356-61. PubMed ID: 18569108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
