These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15609584)

  • 61. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C; Houtgast T
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort.
    Feuerstein JF
    Ear Hear; 1992 Apr; 13(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 1601196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Relation between tone and speech perception in noise-induced hearing loss--determination of characteristics].
    Tymnik G
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1993 Oct; 72(10):493-6. PubMed ID: 8267826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception.
    Lorenzi C; Husson M; Ardoint M; Debruille X
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):487-95. PubMed ID: 17005491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The interference of different background noises on speech processing in elderly hearing impaired subjects.
    Larsby B; Hällgren M; Lyxell B
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S83-90. PubMed ID: 19012115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [The noise-suppression capacity of the auditory analyzer for interfering speech in one's native and in an unknown language].
    Tatevosian GI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1994; (2):14-7. PubMed ID: 7855991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Amplified earmuffs: impact on speech intelligibility in industrial noise for listeners with hearing loss.
    Dolan TG; O'Loughlin D
    Am J Audiol; 2005 Jun; 14(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16180971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Dichotic word recognition in noise and the right-ear advantage.
    Roup CM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 54(1):292-7. PubMed ID: 20689034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [Relations between the discriminatory curve in the speech audiogram and tone audiometric measurement data (author's transl)].
    Tymnik G; Kessler L; Koch R
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1982 Mar; 61(3):135-7. PubMed ID: 7098704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Thresholds of aural overload, word discrimination in noise, and the "fragile ear".
    Humes LE; Bess FH; Schwartz DM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(6):253-7. PubMed ID: 681197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Children's performance in complex listening conditions: effects of hearing loss and digital noise reduction.
    Pittman A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Aug; 54(4):1224-39. PubMed ID: 21330646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
    Lee PJ; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Quality of life and auditory performance in adults with asymmetric hearing loss.
    Vannson N; James C; Fraysse B; Strelnikov K; Barone P; Deguine O; Marx M
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20 Suppl 1():38-43. PubMed ID: 25997394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
    Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Masking effect of music upon oral information processing.
    Tsaneva L
    Cent Eur J Public Health; 2003 Sep; 11(3):173-5. PubMed ID: 14514173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Normative data for the Words-in-Noise Test for 6- to 12-year-old children.
    Wilson RH; Farmer NM; Gandhi A; Shelburne E; Weaver J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1111-21. PubMed ID: 20699343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Occupational hearing loss: coping and family life.
    Hallberg LR
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1996; 43():25-33. PubMed ID: 8738642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Detection and Clinical Diagnosis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss by Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Attias J; Horovitz G; El-Hatib N; Nageris B
    Noise Health; 2001; 3(12):19-31. PubMed ID: 12678938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The effect of the speaker gender on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing subjects with simulated high frequency hearing loss.
    Kiliç MA; Ogüt F
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2004; 125(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15244027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.