392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15609819)
1. Supreme Court decisions improve malpractice environment.
Schulte DJ
J Mich Dent Assoc; 2004 Nov; 86(11):20. PubMed ID: 15609819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical malpractice and tort reform.
Berry MD
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2013 Dec; ():1-18. PubMed ID: 24482882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. US Supreme Court decisions, expert testimony, and implant dentistry.
Flanagan D
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 12498453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The expert witness: understanding the rationale.
Brenner RJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):612-6. PubMed ID: 17845966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why the Supreme Court race is important.
Schulte DJ
Mich Med; 2012; 111(5):4. PubMed ID: 23167039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Could one wrong decision send you to jail?
Crimmins TJ
Minn Med; 1995 Jun; 78(6):34. PubMed ID: 7623748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Status of constitutional attacks against malpractice reform legislation and importance of Supreme Court elections.
Weber RD
Mich Med; 1998 Aug; 98(8):8-10. PubMed ID: 9715608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Supreme Court hears first attack on hard-fought medical liability reforms.
W V Med J; 2004; 100(5):190. PubMed ID: 15617465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. All options on table in wake of Supreme Court decision.
Busalacchi S
WMJ; 2005 Aug; 104(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 16218306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The physician (surgeon) as an expert witness in the court room].
Hempel K
Chirurg; 1992 Nov; 63(11):Suppl 215-8. PubMed ID: 1458976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
Hawkins TS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physicians need help in the courts.
Thorson D
Minn Med; 2013 Aug; 96(8):39. PubMed ID: 24490428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HIPAA requirement preempting civil discovery rules in malpractice and related suits significant.
Threlkeld RC
J Med Assoc Ga; 2008; 97(4):25. PubMed ID: 19288669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Developmental trends in the malpractice process. II: Legal process and legal malpractice].
Broglie MG
Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1992 Aug; 47(8):371-6. PubMed ID: 1413930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reeves decision changes expert witness qualifications.
Schulte DJ
J Orofac Pain; 2008; 22(4):364. PubMed ID: 19090409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recent decisions by the Supreme Court are beneficial to physicians.
Schulte DJ
Mich Med; 2011; 110(5):3. PubMed ID: 22128504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Preemption and malpractice liability.
Hauser RG
N Engl J Med; 2009 May; 360(21):2257-8; author reply 2258. PubMed ID: 19458378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Why this year's Supreme Court elections are so important.
Weber RD
J Mich Dent Assoc; 1998 Sep; 80(7):22-4. PubMed ID: 9863435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Legal liability and responsibility of the physician].
Bock RW
Chirurg; 1992 Sep; 63(9):suppl 176-80. PubMed ID: 1395870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Workers of the world, panic!
Parloff R
Fortune; 2004 Jul; 150(1):36, 38. PubMed ID: 15270460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
