These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1561024)

  • 21. Effects of self-motion on attention in real 3D space.
    Kimura T; Miura T; Doi S; Yamamoto Y
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jul; 131(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19524213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fixational eye movements and motion perception.
    Murakami I
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 154():193-209. PubMed ID: 17010711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of flashed and moving probes in the flash-lag effect: evidence for misbinding of abrupt and continuous changes.
    Gauch A; Kerzel D
    Vision Res; 2008 Jul; 48(15):1584-91. PubMed ID: 18538814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inhibition of vection by red.
    Seno T; Sunaga S; Ito H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1642-53. PubMed ID: 20675807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Action-specific extrapolation of target motion in human visual system.
    Ashida H
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1515-24. PubMed ID: 15246289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial facilitation is involved in flash-lag effect.
    Maiche A; Budelli R; Gómez-Sena L
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(12):1655-61. PubMed ID: 17445857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Localizing the onset of moving stimuli by pointing or relative judgment: variations in the size of the Fröhlich effect.
    Müsseler J; Stork S; Kerzel D
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):611-7. PubMed ID: 18207214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Illusory temporal order for stimuli at different depth positions.
    Ichikawa M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):578-93. PubMed ID: 19304648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two-stroke: a new illusion of visual motion based on the time course of neural responses in the human visual system.
    Mather G
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(13):2015-8. PubMed ID: 16487987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attentional tracking in the perception of apparent motion: evidence from sequential blanking displays.
    Gellatly A; Blurton A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 7754086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The filling-in illusion and moving visual phantoms.
    Fraser A; Wilcox K; Storgion S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Apr; 54(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 7079062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The facing bias in biological motion perception: structure, kinematics, and body parts.
    Schouten B; Troje NF; Verfaillie K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):130-43. PubMed ID: 21258915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events.
    Watanabe K; Shimojo S
    Perception; 1998; 27(9):1041-54. PubMed ID: 10341934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Motion fading is driven by perceived, not actual angular velocity.
    Kohler PJ; Caplovitz GP; Hsieh PJ; Sun J; Tse PU
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(11):1086-94. PubMed ID: 20371254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frame-and-spot-induced motion: range effects and the difference between fixation and nonfixation of the induced stimulus.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Apr; 76(2):653-4. PubMed ID: 8483683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Object motion perception is shaped by the motor control mechanism of ocular pursuit.
    Schweigart G; Mergner T; Barnes GR
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Feb; 148(3):350-65. PubMed ID: 12541146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of gaze on vection from jittering, oscillating, and purely radial optic flow.
    Palmisano S; Kim J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1842-53. PubMed ID: 19933567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. No-onset looming motion guides spatial attention.
    von Mühlenen A; Lleras A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 18085944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of two types of induced-motion displays on perceived location of the induced target.
    Bacon JH; Gordon A; Schulman PH
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Oct; 32(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 7155781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Motion by nearby players biases perception but not action in judgments of baseball destination.
    Oberle CD; Hollums NK; McBeath MK; Terry DP
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Oct; 103(2):585-606. PubMed ID: 17165423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.