227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15610541)
1. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture.
Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 15610541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress transfer of four mandibular implant overdenture cantilever designs.
Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 15507904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of anchorage systems and extension base contact on load transfer with mandibular implant-retained overdentures.
Sadowsky SJ; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 11005906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Photoelastic analysis of the distribution of stress in different systems of overdentures on osseous-integrated implants.
Machado AC; Cardoso L; Brandt WC; Henriques GE; de Arruda Nóbilo MA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2332-6. PubMed ID: 22134270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations.
Daas M; Dubois G; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P; Rignon-Bret C
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Mar; 30(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 17383925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: 3-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol.
Walton JN
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12854788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro study of reduction of stress transferred onto tissues around implants using a resilient material in maxillary implant overdentures.
Kanazawa M; Minakuchi S; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Uchida T
J Med Dent Sci; 2007 Mar; 54(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19845131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
